waro-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to waro-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to interact with Odoo 17 ERP via external API, providing tools for inventory management, sales order processing, and customer management through natural language.-
- FlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with a restaurant FastAPI backend for menu management, order processing, customer management, and analytics through natural language.241-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with WhatsApp via the official WhatsApp Cloud API, providing tools for sending messages, templates, media, and managing conversations.1311 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes the Loyverse API as MCP tools to manage stores, products, inventory, customers, receipts, and more from AI assistants.54MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query a retail and food-service point-of-sale database through predefined business tools for sales summaries, top products, margins, stagnant inventory, cash reconciliation, and optional stock adjustments, returning formatted markdown answers.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes a curated subset of the Officegest API v2 (22 CRUD tools) for managing clients, sales, and stock to AI clients like Claude Code and Claude Desktop.1-
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Several tools have overlapping analytics purposes (analytics_waros, analytics_rfm, analytics_churn_risk, analytics_food_cost, analytics_alerts, analytics_data_quality, analytics_cohort, analytics_menu) but each targets distinct metrics. Some confusion possible between waros_estimate and waros_balances/customer, and between sales_list/metrics/detail and customers_orders, but descriptions are specific enough. However, sales_list vs sales_detail are clear, and customers_orders vs customers_list/detail are distinct. The overlap in analytics tools is moderate, but not severe.
The naming follows a general pattern of domain_subject, e.g., 'analytics_*', 'waros_*', 'queries_*', 'sales_*', 'customers_*', 'menu_*'. This is fairly consistent, but there are some deviations: 'waro_schema' and 'waro_ping' use a different prefix than the 'waros_*' group, and mixed order in 'financial_products'. The pattern is mostly predictable but has minor irregularities.
26 tools is slightly heavy but within the range for a comprehensive business analytics server covering multiple domains (analytics, sales, customers, menu, WAROS, queries). The count is high but each tool appears purpose-specific and covers a broad domain, so it's acceptable. Not excessive like 50+.
The tool surface covers a wide range of business analytics: sales, customers, menu, WAROS, financial metrics, queries. It includes list/detail/metrics and analytics for major areas. However, there are some gaps: no tool for updating/creating data (though analytics servers are often read-only), no explicit tool for user management or settings, but for the intended purpose of analytics and reporting, it seems fairly complete. There is also a queries_run and queries_schema for custom queries, which adds flexibility.