claude-codex-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to claude-codex-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to call OpenAI Codex for read-only design, deep reasoning, and code review tasks.42 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to hand off implementation tasks to OpenAI Codex models running through the Codex CLI, with tools for listing models, delegating work synchronously or in the background, collecting results, and continuing past sessions, while Claude stays the orchestrator that reviews diffs and runs tests.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to leverage OpenAI models for expert code review, deep architecture analysis, and security audits, with automatic markdown report generation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceTurn ChatGPT into Codex! OR Turn Claude Web into Claude Code!708 npm5,447MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate tasks to OpenAI's Codex CLI (GPT-5.4) with structured execution traces, parallel execution, session persistence, and adversarial code review.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceBridges Claude Code and OpenAI Codex through MCP, allowing cross-harness querying, code review, explanation, and implementation delegation.610 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle operation: start (new thread), resume (reattach saved thread), message (continue/idle turn), stop (interrupt), status, events, answer, and models. The main overlap risk is between codex_status and codex_events, both of which read state, but descriptions differentiate session state vs. event journal.
Every tool uses the codex_ prefix with a clear snake_case verb/noun form (codex_start, codex_message, codex_events, codex_stop). The pattern is uniform and highly predictable.
Eight tools is well-scoped for an agent-bridge server covering session lifecycle, messaging, event retrieval, and model listing. Each tool appears to earn its place without redundancy.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: start, resume, message, stop, status, events, answer, and models. Minor gaps exist, such as explicit session teardown/cleanup or listing historical threads beyond resume, but core workflows are covered.