claude-codex-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to claude-codex-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to call OpenAI Codex for read-only design, deep reasoning, and code review tasks.47 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to leverage OpenAI models for expert code review, deep architecture analysis, and security audits, with automatic markdown report generation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceTurn ChatGPT into Codex! OR Turn Claude Web into Claude Code!1,521 npm5,127MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate tasks to OpenAI's Codex CLI (GPT-5.4) with structured execution traces, parallel execution, session persistence, and adversarial code review.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceBridges Claude Code and OpenAI Codex through MCP, allowing cross-harness querying, code review, explanation, and implementation delegation.65 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables OpenAI Codex to consult Claude Code for co-analysis, adversarial second opinions, and read-only file review over the Model Context Protocol, with Claude remaining advisory and unable to modify files.937 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct Codex lifecycle action: start, message, stop, resume, answer, status, events, and model listing. There is no meaningful overlap, and edge cases like codex_message versus codex_answer are clearly separated by their descriptions.
All tools share a clean codex_ prefix and use snake_case consistently. Most names are imperative verbs, but models, status, and events are noun-style read operations, which is a minor deviation from a strict verb_noun pattern.
Eight tools is a well-scoped size for a bridge server managing a live agent lifecycle. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy or bloat.
The set covers the full agent lifecycle: starting, sending messages, stopping, resuming, answering questions, checking status, and reading event history. There are no obvious gaps that would leave an agent unable to complete a workflow.