windai-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to windai-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for wind forecasts, live measurements, wave forecasts, and tides, enabling kite and surf spot checks via AI assistants.54 npmMIT

GribStream MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceHosted MCP server for weather forecast data. Enables AI agents to discover datasets, build validated API requests, and execute live weather queries after OAuth.MIT
WeatherAI MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceWeatherAI MCP server — 11 live weather tools for Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI assistant43 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceGeolocation AI - MCP server providing AI-powered tools and automation by MEOK AI Labs14 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to look up solar permitting authorities, estimate solar production via PVWatts, and retrieve irradiance data. It streamlines the creation of solar-aware workflows by integrating industry-standard APIs like NREL.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEU Crop Intelligence MCP Server — Yield forecasts, weather analysis, and phenology models for 15 countries. AI agent-native, multi-source intelligence (NASA POWER, Eurostat, Open-Meteo).MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_wind_estimate provides free approximate data, get_wind_farm_assessment provides detailed paid analysis, compare_wind_sites handles multi-location comparison, and the remaining two provide service metadata (pricing, model info). No functional overlap exists.
All tools use snake_case with verb_noun structure (get_, compare_). The 'windai' prefix appears only on meta-tools (model_info, pricing) distinguishing service information from wind data tools, which is logical but slightly unconventional.
Five tools is an ideal count for this specialized domain: three core wind assessment functions (quick estimate, detailed assessment, comparison) plus two supporting tools (pricing, methodology). No bloat, no missing essentials.
Covers the core wind resource assessment workflow well (screening → detailed analysis → comparison). Minor gaps include no account/credit balance check tool (relevant since assessments require paid credits) and no ability to retrieve past assessment history.