Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to windai-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for wind forecasts, live measurements, wave forecasts, and tides, enabling kite and surf spot checks via AI assistants.
      5
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server for weather forecast data. Enables AI agents to discover datasets, build validated API requests, and execute live weather queries after OAuth.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to look up solar permitting authorities, estimate solar production via PVWatts, and retrieve irradiance data. It streamlines the creation of solar-aware workflows by integrating industry-standard APIs like NREL.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      EU Crop Intelligence MCP Server — Yield forecasts, weather analysis, and phenology models for 15 countries. AI agent-native, multi-source intelligence (NASA POWER, Eurostat, Open-Meteo).
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_wind_estimate provides free approximate data, get_wind_farm_assessment provides detailed paid analysis, compare_wind_sites handles multi-location comparison, and the remaining two provide service metadata (pricing, model info). No functional overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case with verb_noun structure (get_, compare_). The 'windai' prefix appears only on meta-tools (model_info, pricing) distinguishing service information from wind data tools, which is logical but slightly unconventional.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is an ideal count for this specialized domain: three core wind assessment functions (quick estimate, detailed assessment, comparison) plus two supporting tools (pricing, methodology). No bloat, no missing essentials.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the core wind resource assessment workflow well (screening → detailed analysis → comparison). Minor gaps include no account/credit balance check tool (relevant since assessments require paid credits) and no ability to retrieve past assessment history.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues