A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceManages employee leave with Claude Desktop via natural language. Enables checking balances, applying, approving, and reviewing leave requests through a Supabase-backed MCP server.
10
MIT
LeaveManager
Related Servers
Alternatives to LeaveManager
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to interact with a Lucca instance to list employees, departments, and view absences in natural language.3MIT
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude Desktop to access structured employee data and perform HR operations including employee lookups, searches, and global leave requests.31MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes leave management APIs through MCP, enabling users to manage employee leave requests, approvals, and balances via natural language. It bridges Claude Desktop to a Flask backend with PostgreSQL persistence.-
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing employee leave requests, balances, and types with natural language, using a dummy in-memory database.6-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables querying attendance information and managing employee leave requests, overtime requests, and schedules.-
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: apply_leave is for submitting new leave requests, get_leave_balance shows remaining leave days, and get_leave_history retrieves past leave records. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (apply_leave, get_leave_balance, get_leave_history) with clear, descriptive names. The pattern is uniform throughout, enhancing readability and predictability.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a leave management domain, as it lacks operations like updating or canceling leave requests, viewing team leave calendars, or approving/rejecting leave. While the tools cover basic needs, the scope is borderline minimal.
Completeness2/5
The tool set has significant gaps for a leave management system. It includes apply, balance, and history but misses critical operations such as update_leave, delete_leave, list_pending_requests, or approve_leave. This incomplete coverage will likely cause agent failures in real-world workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues