workflow-guard-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to workflow-guard-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to evaluate actions against team-defined policies, record decisions, and obtain human approvals for potentially risky operations.38 npm1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding agents to check npm packages, GitHub Action refs, and remote scripts before execution, returning deterministic ALLOW/DENY/REVIEW verdicts with evidence and a re-checkable manifest.MIT

Vaikora Guard MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnforces deterministic policies on AI agent tool calls, evaluating actions against compliance modules (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) and returning ALLOW, BLOCK, or CONSTRAIN decisions with an audit trail.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives AI agents policy-checked tools for shell commands, file reads and writes, HTTP fetches and tool calls, deciding each action against a policy before it runs while tracking secret taint and recording every decision in a tamper-evident audit log.MIT

ERDL Guardofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnforces deterministic policy decisions on AI agent tool calls, supporting allow, deny, correct, escalate, and human review actions with verifiable audit receipts.10 npmMIT
agentguardofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnforces policy controls for AI agents, including spend limits, action approvals, kill switch, scoped credentials, dry-run diffs, loop prevention, and auditable hash-chained logs.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
guard_check and guard_status have clearly distinct purposes: one evaluates an action, the other reports capabilities and enforcement boundaries. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent guard_ prefix with lowercase underscore naming. The pattern is uniform and predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin even for its narrow purpose. The count is borderline, sitting at the low end of what might be considered a minimal but workable surface.
The two tools cover the core guard workflow (evaluate action, check status) with only minor gaps like listing specific rules or explaining decisions. Agents can likely work around these by using the provided tools.