Skip to main content
Glama
ukkz

Claude TypeScript MCP Servers

by ukkz

Related Servers

Alternatives to Claude TypeScript MCP Servers

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A custom Model Context Protocol server that gives Claude Desktop and other LLMs access to file system operations and command execution capabilities through standardized tool interfaces.
      23
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive suite of Model Context Protocol servers designed to extend AI agent Claude's capabilities with integrations for knowledge management, reasoning, advanced search, news access, and workspace tools.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude Desktop to perform file operations like reading, writing, listing directories, and managing files through natural language commands.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready Model Context Protocol server that provides comprehensive file system management capabilities for seamless integration with Claude Desktop.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: brave_local_search is focused on location-based queries for businesses, services, and attractions, while brave_web_search handles general web searches for current events, news, and broader information. There is no overlap in their intended use cases, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool based on the query type.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent naming pattern with the prefix 'brave_' followed by a descriptive term ('local_search' and 'web_search'), using snake_case throughout. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand, with no deviations in style or structure.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a general-purpose search functionality, as it might lack coverage for specific domains or advanced search capabilities. While the tools are well-defined, a broader scope could benefit from additional tools to handle more nuanced search types or integrations, making the count borderline for the apparent purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core search needs with local and web search, providing a good foundation for real-time information retrieval. However, there are minor gaps, such as the absence of tools for specialized searches (e.g., image, video, or academic searches) or advanced filtering options, which agents might need to work around for more complex queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues