Skip to main content
Glama
ukicar

Gallica/BnF MCP Server

by ukicar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gallica/BnF MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BnF API Server

      iflow-mcp
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching documents in Gallica, the digital library of the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and generating structured research reports with citations and images.
      -

    • gallica-mcp

      nestordemeure
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and accessing OCR text from millions of digitized documents in Gallica, the digital library of the Bibliothèque nationale de France, through MCP tools for text search, snippet retrieval, and full-text download.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • BnF API Server

      Kryzo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model-Client-Protocol server that enables users to search the Gallica digital library of the National Library of France and generate structured sequential research reports with formatted citations and relevant images.
      12
      -

    • swiss-academic-libraries-mcp

      malkreide
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to search and retrieve bibliographic and digitized records from Swiss academic libraries (swisscovery, e-rara, e-periodica, e-manuscripta) via open protocols without requiring API keys.
      16
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is significant overlap between the six specific search tools (search_by_author, search_by_title, etc.) and the general natural_language_search and advanced_search tools, which could cause confusion about when to use each. The sequential_reporting tool stands out as a high-level workflow tool that might be misapplied instead of using the underlying search and retrieval tools directly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is mostly consistent with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_item_details, search_by_author), but there are minor deviations: advanced_search uses an adjective instead of a verb, and sequential_reporting uses an adjective rather than a verb, breaking the pattern slightly. Overall, the naming is readable and follows a clear convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 12 tools, the count is reasonable for a digital library server, covering search, retrieval, and reporting functions. It is slightly on the higher side but well-scoped for the domain, as it includes multiple search facets and detailed item handling, without being overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong coverage for searching and retrieving documents, including metadata, pages, images, and text. However, there are minor gaps: no tools for user account management (e.g., saving favorites or history) or batch operations (e.g., downloading multiple items), which might be useful for advanced research workflows but are not essential for core functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources