A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceExposes Swagger/OpenAPI API documentation to AI models, enabling exploration, search, and interaction with endpoints, schemas, and execution of API calls.
14
4 npm
2
MIT
Custom OpenAPI MCP Server
by ujwal-patel
Related Servers
Alternatives to Custom OpenAPI MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceDynamically exposes any OpenAPI/Swagger API as tools for AI assistants, automatically generating MCP tools from OpenAPI specs with authentication support.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes OpenAPI/Swagger API documentation as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to search, inspect, and call API endpoints through natural language.518 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with access to OpenAPI specifications, enabling API discovery, schema retrieval, and direct API execution with support for OAuth 2.0 and other authentication methods.3 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to discover, search, and interact with REST APIs by parsing OpenAPI/Swagger specifications with intelligent fuzzy search across endpoints, supporting both local and remote API sources.6 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, search, and call any REST API described by an OpenAPI or Swagger document. Supports multiple API endpoints with authentication and parameter handling.10 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: listing endpoints under a tag, describing a specific endpoint, and generating a request example. There's no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern in snake_case: list_endpoints_by_tag, describe_endpoint, generate_request_example. This is perfectly consistent.
Tool Count4/5
Three tools is on the low end but still within the expected range for a focused server. It feels slightly thin for general OpenAPI exploration, but each tool earns its place.
Completeness3/5
The set covers tagged endpoint listing, detailed endpoint descriptions, and request example generation, but lacks a way to list available tags or all endpoints without a tag. This is a notable gap that could hinder agents unfamiliar with the API structure.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues