Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Uindow

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Agent-native browser control MCP server that enables AI agents to browse and interact with web pages via accessibility tree snapshots and ref ID-based commands.
    15
    2
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Windows GUI automation MCP server for Claude Code, enabling deterministic desktop app control via 32 tools including window management, input, pixel search, and file verification, leveraging the AutoIt backend.
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    civyk-winwright is a Playwright-style MCP server for Windows desktop and browser automation. It provides 59 tools for controlling WPF, WinForms, Win32 apps, and Chrome/Edge via the Model Context Protocol. A unified automation layer connecting Claude and MCP-compatible agents to native Windows UI and web interfaces.
    19
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants full control over native Windows applications — launch, inspect, click, type, screenshot, and test any WinUI3, WPF, WinForms, UWP, or Win32 app.
    44 npm
    39
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A local MCP server that lets an assistant observe and control Windows application windows, plus interact with Xiaomi MiMo AI Desktop workflows, through 22 tools for Unicode typing, smooth dragging, cross-window drops, and bounded SSE streaming.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI clients to securely control and interact with a local Windows machine through 218 configurable tools for files, Git, processes, Windows UI, browser automation, WSL, Office, recovery, skills, and child MCP servers.
    5 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 38 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Tools are cleanly separated into app lifecycle, agent management/execution, and module-source editing groups. Potential lookalikes like agent_start/agent_execute and agent_status/agent_logs are explicitly distinguished in their descriptions. Even the many type-specific input/output setters are unambiguous because each name names the type.

Naming Consistency5/5

Naming follows a predictable domain prefix plus snake_case action pattern (app_*, agent_*, src_*). Type-specific setters like src_input_set_bool and src_output_set_table are parallel and easy to generalize. No mixed casing or arbitrary verb styles appear.

Tool Count2/5

38 tools is well above the 25+ threshold and feels heavy even for a broad automation/module-authoring server. The type-specific input and output setter tools (10 variants) inflate the count and could have been consolidated behind one generic setter with a type parameter. Still, no tool feels completely redundant.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers the full workflow: docs, app lifecycle, agent CRUD/status/execution/logging/screenshots, source export/import, FSM/function editing, keys management, and all input/output definitions. There are no obvious dead ends or missing lifecycle operations.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues