Skip to main content
Glama
dawa

mcp_auth_server

by dawa

mcp_auth_server

A local, runnable proof of concept of the MCP Authorization spec (2025-11-25).

It demonstrates, end to end:

  • an MCP server acting as a proper OAuth 2.1 resource server — publishes RFC 9728 Protected Resource Metadata, validates audience-bound access tokens, and enforces scope on a protected tool;

  • a one-command MCP client that discovers the authorization server, registers via Client ID Metadata Documents (CIMD), runs the full OAuth 2.1 + PKCE handshake (including a step-up re-authorization), and calls the protected tool;

  • a minimal custom OAuth 2.1 authorization server behind the MCP server.

Why a custom authorization server?

CIMD is draft-ietf-oauth-client-id-metadata-document-00. No off-the-shelf OSS or SaaS authorization server supports it yet, so using one would still require writing a CIMD shim. A small custom AS gives full, correct CIMD support and lets the whole thing run locally as a single command.

Related MCP server: MCP Auth

Quick start

uv venv && uv pip install -e ".[dev]"   # one-time setup
./scripts/run.sh                          # or: uv run python -m mcp_auth.demo

run.sh starts the authorization server and the resource server, then runs the client, which prints a step-by-step trace of the handshake and the protected tool's result, e.g.:

[1] Discovery
  401 challenge -> resource_metadata=...
  PRM: resource=http://localhost:8001/mcp as=['http://localhost:9000/'] scopes=['mcp:connect']
  AS metadata discovered at http://localhost:9000/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
[2] Authorization (CIMD + PKCE) for base scope
[3] Call unprotected tool 'whoami'
[4] Call protected tool 'get_weather' (expect insufficient scope)
[5] Step-up re-authorization for the extra scope
[6] Retry 'get_weather' with stepped-up token
=== Success: full CIMD + OAuth 2.1 + step-up flow completed ===

Architecture

src/mcp_auth/
  config.py              shared ports, URLs, scopes, token TTL
  keys.py                authorization-server RSA signing key + JWKS export
  auth_server/           custom OAuth 2.1 authorization server (Starlette)
    app.py               AS metadata, /authorize, /token, /jwks
    cimd.py              fetch + validate Client ID Metadata Documents
    store.py             single-use authorization-code store
    tokens.py            RS256 JWT minting (aud=resource) + PKCE S256 verify
  resource_server/       FastMCP server as an OAuth 2.1 resource server
    server.py            FastMCP app + whoami + protected get_weather tool
    verifier.py          JWT verifier: signature, issuer, expiry, audience
  client/                one-command CIMD-driven MCP client
    metadata.py          the client's CIMD document + a server that hosts it
    flow.py              401 -> PRM -> AS discovery -> PKCE authorize -> token
    run.py               full journey incl. step-up
  demo.py                orchestrator (single command)

Default ports: authorization server :9000, resource server :8001, client CIMD host :3000. The canonical resource URI (the token audience) is http://localhost:8001/mcp.

How the flow maps to the spec

Spec requirement

Where

RFC 9728 Protected Resource Metadata

FastMCP, auto-served at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp

401 + WWW-Authenticate with resource_metadata

FastMCP RequireAuthMiddleware

RFC 8414 AS metadata incl. code_challenge_methods_supported, client_id_metadata_document_supported

auth_server/app.py

CIMD: fetch client doc, validate client_id == URL, validate redirect_uri

auth_server/cimd.py

Authorization code + PKCE S256

auth_server/app.py, client/flow.py

RFC 8707 resource parameter in auth + token requests

client/flow.py

Audience-bound tokens; resource server validates aud

auth_server/tokens.py, resource_server/verifier.py

Scope enforcement + insufficient_scope + step-up

resource_server/server.py, client/run.py

Tests

uv run pytest

Covers AS/PRM metadata shape, CIMD validation (mismatched client_id, unlisted redirect URI, missing fields, SSRF host), PKCE and token claims, audience/expiry rejection in the verifier, and a full single-command end-to-end run.

Deliberate deviations from the spec (because this is a local PoC)

These are the conscious trade-offs that let the PoC run fully locally with one command. Each would be tightened for a real deployment:

  • HTTP on localhost instead of HTTPS. The spec mandates HTTPS for AS endpoints and the CIMD client_id URL; localhost redirect URIs are already spec-permitted. The MCP SDK's AnyHttpUrl accepts http, so no patching is needed.

  • Headless auto-approved consent. The AS authenticates a fixed demo subject and issues a code without a browser prompt, so the client reads the redirect directly (no callback listener). A real AS would authenticate the user and show a consent screen.

  • In-memory, process-local state (signing key, authorization codes). No persistence, no refresh-token rotation.

  • SSRF guard is a localhost allowlist for CIMD fetches, sufficient for local use; a real AS needs a stricter trust policy per the CIMD draft's security considerations.

Out of scope

  • infra/terraform/ (anticipated by .gitignore) — a local PoC needs no cloud infra.

  • Multi-user login UI, Dynamic Client Registration (CIMD is used instead), persistent storage.

F
license - not found
-
quality - not tested
C
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dawa/mcp_auth_server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server