wallet-verifier-mcp
Server Details
MCP server for verifying EUDI/Talao wallet data via OIDC4VP (pull) for AI agents.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- TalaoDAO/connectors
- GitHub Stars
- 0
- Server Listing
- Wallet4Agent MCP Server
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool has a clearly defined purpose of creating an account.
The tool name 'create_account' follows the standard verb_noun pattern, which is clear and conventional. There are no other tools to create inconsistency.
The server has only one tool, which is too few for its apparent scope. Given the name 'wallet-verifier-mcp', one would expect verification tools beyond just account creation, making the count inadequate.
The server's purpose, as implied by its name, is wallet verification, but the only tool creates accounts. There are no verification, lookup, or management tools, leaving the surface severely incomplete.
Available Tools
1 toolcreate_accountBInspect
Create aan account for a human or a company. This tool will generate a decentralized identifier(DID) and a data wallet.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile | No | Identity ecosystem profile or regulation | DIIP V3 |
| did_method | No | Optional DID Method, did:web (DNS based) by default or did:cheqd (blockchain based) | did:cheqd |
| account_type | No | Human or Company as a the owner of the Agents | human |
| notification_email | Yes | Email used for notification and authentication. Email must be confirmed to make the account active |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses that the tool generates a DID and data wallet as side effects, which provides some behavioral transparency. However, it omits details such as the email confirmation requirement (mentioned only in the schema), idempotency, failure modes, or reversibility. Without annotations, the description carries a partial burden but does not fully address these aspects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and well-structured, with the primary action front-loaded in the first sentence and supporting detail in the second. Every word earns its place, despite the minor typo 'aan'. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is incomplete for the tool's complexity. It does not mention the return value (no output schema exists), the email confirmation process, or potential failure scenarios. The schema covers parameters, but the description lacks operational context that would allow an agent to fully anticipate the tool's behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema description coverage, all four parameters are already documented in the input schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter-specific meaning, so it relies on the schema. The baseline of 3 applies because the schema fully covers parameter semantics.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: to create an account for a human or company, and explicitly mentions it generates a decentralized identifier (DID) and a data wallet. The verb 'Create' and resource 'account' are specific, making the purpose unambiguous even without sibling tools to distinguish from.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or contextual hints. It simply states what it does, leaving the agent without information about appropriate usage scenarios or any exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- Changed
create_account1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / profileAdded value: +{ + "default": "DIIP V3", + "description": "Identity ecosystem profile or regulation", + "enum": [ + "DIIP V3", + "EUDIW", + "EBSI", + "DIIP V5" + ], + "type": "string" +}
1 tool update
- First observed
create_account
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity – fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge – works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge – works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Boson Protocol — on-chain agentic commerce for physical & digital goods.
Tenzro Network MCP server: wallet, identity, payments, inference, staking, bridges, verification.
EUDI Wallet MCP — EU Digital Identity Wallet under eIDAS 2.0 for AI agent authentication via
AI governance MCP server for EU AI Act compliance and jurisdiction verification
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access31MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for AI agent identity and authorization. Create, verify, and manage agent identities with trust scores and scoped authorization tokens.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMock identity-management MCP server for decentralized identity that allows minting DIDs, issuing signed Verifiable Credentials, and verifying them.8-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.