Skip to main content
Glama
udah1

cursor-chat-bridge

Post a message and wait for the reply

bridge_send_and_await

Post a message to a chat thread and wait for the reply in a single round trip. Returns the reply, a timeout, or a stopped status to keep the conversation moving.

Instructions

Posts a message to this conversation's chat thread and then blocks for the reply in one round trip — the end-of-turn summary-plus-question pattern, and the tool to reach for by default. Equivalent to bridge_send followed by bridge_await; use those separately only when you need to post and wait at different moments. Returns the same envelope as bridge_await: 'message' with the reply, 'timeout', or 'stopped'. The message is posted before the wait begins, so after a 'timeout' the user has already seen it — send only what is new rather than repeating the summary, which would post it twice.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textNoMessage body to post, as plain text — typically the end-of-turn summary plus the question you need answered. Keep credentials and secrets out of it: whoever can read the chat thread can read this.
messageNoAlias for `text`; ignored when `text` is present. Message body to post, as plain text — typically the end-of-turn summary plus the question you need answered. Keep credentials and secrets out of it: whoever can read the chat thread can read this.
sessionYesSession handle returned by bridge_start for THIS conversation. Routes the call to the right chat thread and keeps concurrent conversations — even two in the same workspace — from crossing over.
maxBlockMsNoHow long to wait for a reply before giving up and returning status 'timeout', in milliseconds. Defaults to 50000 and is capped at 55000 to stay inside the MCP call timeout — wait longer by calling again, not by raising this.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses blocking behavior, the fact that the message is posted before waiting, and the timeout side effect (user already saw the message). It also names the return envelope values. This goes beyond the annotations and adds critical behavioral context, with no contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is information-dense yet concise, with every sentence earning its place: action, default status, alternatives, return envelope, and a practical caveat. Well-front-loaded and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (send + wait) and lack of an output schema, the description covers return values, timeout side effects, relationship to sibling tools, and the end-of-turn pattern. It provides enough context for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for all four parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add parameter-level details beyond the schema, though it does reinforce the timeout behavior related to maxBlockMs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool posts a message and blocks for the reply in one round trip, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings by positioning as the default and explaining equivalence to bridge_send + bridge_await.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly labels this as 'the tool to reach for by default' and advises using bridge_send/bridge_await separately only when posting and waiting at different moments. This provides clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/udah1/cursor-chat-bridge'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server