AI or Not MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to AI or Not MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables detection of AI-generated content in text, images, video, and audio via the ZeroTrue API, supporting multiple analysis tools and MCP-compatible clients.68 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to analyze images, videos, audio, and text files for AI-generated content using the Reality Defender API, with support for user file uploads and direct URL analysis.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables detection of AI-generated content from ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Gemini models through the BACH AI Content Detector API.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to analyze images from a URL, local path, or Base64 string and determine whether they are AI-generated, including detection of signatures from Flux, Midjourney, DALL·E, and Stable Diffusion. Also inspects cryptographic C2PA provenance manifests, signing certificate authorities, and camera EXIF metadata without requiring API keys or accounts.2257 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI content watermarking and C2PA compliance for EU AI Act Article 50, enabling detection, verification, and batch processing of authenticated content.2 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to detect AI-generated music, images, and video by analyzing files through SongCheck's ensemble detector, providing verdicts and confidence scores.41-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are completely distinct: one performs media analysis and the other checks API liveness. There is no possible confusion between them.
Both tools share the consistent `aiornot_` prefix and use snake_case, but `analyze_media` is a clear verb_noun while `is_live` is a status-style name rather than an action on an object. Minor deviation in an otherwise predictable pattern.
With only two tools, the server is minimal, but the narrow purpose of wrapping the AI or Not API makes the count reasonable. It is slightly thin but not insufficient.
The analysis tool covers all supported media types (image, video, audio, text) and returns confidence scores, while the liveness tool covers API availability. For the stated purpose, there are no obvious gaps.