Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cursor-cloud-agents-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables delegating coding tasks to Cursor Cloud Agents from Claude Code, Codex, or Grok, with scoped repository access, progress monitoring, follow-ups, and result reporting.
      23
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an orchestrator like Claude Code to hand coding work off to Cursor SDK agents, run as detached background jobs that survive the session and can be listed, inspected, steered, resumed, or stopped. Agents are asynchronous and reusable across follow-up turns, letting expensive frontier models delegate cheaply without blocking or paying to read the results.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables external MCP clients to drive DeepSeek Harness agents for real coding tasks, providing tools for task execution and queueing, session management, sandboxed file access, preset switching, and usage statistics.
      357
      2
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action: launch, status, followup, result, cancel, list, models, whoami, usage. The overlap between cursor_status and cursor_result is explicitly resolved in descriptions (result is a convenience wrapper that waits server-side). No real ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent cursor_<verb/noun> snake_case pattern (cursor_launch, cursor_status, cursor_followup, cursor_list, cursor_models, etc.). Predictable and uniform throughout, and prefixing avoids collision with other servers.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a cloud agent orchestration server. Each earns its place: launch/poll/followup/cancel cover the run lifecycle, plus auxiliary helpers (models, list, whoami, usage) that are genuinely useful rather than filler.

    Completeness4/5

    Full agent lifecycle is covered: model discovery, launch, status, follow-up, result, cancel, list, auth check, and usage. Minor gaps exist such as no explicit archive/delete agent or run-logs streaming tool, but core workflows are complete and descriptions preempt common dead ends (idempotency, unknown status reconciliation).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues