No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 132 tools
The descriptions carefully distinguish many tools, but with 132 tools there are several overlapping families: multiple *_ls read-only listers, several *_sheet visual inspection tools (shot_sheet, footage_sheet, contact_sheet, reframe_sheet, graphic_sheet, spot_frames), and many *_check verifiers (verify, check_frames, film_check, finish_check, hold_check). The set is mostly separable by domain, but an agent has many chances to misselect among closely related lifecycle and inspection tools.
All names use snake_case, which is readable, but the pattern is mixed: verb_noun (cut_by_transcript, add_captions, build_shots), noun_verb (cue_add, graphic_ls), bare nouns (assets, events, fonts, synopsis), and one-word verbs (undo, export, verify). There is no single predictable convention like list_x/get_x/create_x throughout.
132 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server and far exceeds the 50+ threshold in the rubric for a severe mismatch. Even for a complex video-proofing pipeline, the surface is enormous and likely to overwhelm tool selection and maintenance.
The tool surface is unusually deep across the proofcut domain: project init/migration, media import, transcription, cutting, cues, overlays, graphics/cards, audio beds, holds, reframing, export, verification, and review rounds. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit multi-project listing/management and no general multi-track editing), but the core lifecycle is thoroughly covered.