Skip to main content
Glama

search_records

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search Odoo records by specifying model name, domain filters, fields to return, limit, offset, and sort order. Use multiple conditions, OR logic, and advanced operators to query any Odoo model.

Instructions

Search for records in an Odoo model.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modelYesModel name (e.g., 'res.partner')
domainNoOdoo search domain (list of conditions). Examples: - Simple: [["name", "=", "John"]] - Multiple (AND): [["is_company", "=", True], ["active", "=", True]] - OR condition: ["|", ["name", "ilike", "test"], ["email", "ilike", "test"]] - any (Odoo 19+): [["order_line", "any", [["product_uom_qty", ">", 5]]]] - Operators: =, !=, >, >=, <, <=, like, ilike, in, not in, child_of, any
fieldsNoFields to return (None = auto-exclude dangerous fields like binary/image/html)
limitNoMaximum number of records
offsetNoNumber of records to skip
orderNoSort order (e.g., 'name asc', 'create_date desc')

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., that results depend on model permissions or that it returns a list). Bar is lowered by good annotations, but the description does not add value beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently states the tool's core function with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich input schema and annotations, the description is minimally adequate but lacks context about usage scope (e.g., domain filtering) and return behavior. Output schema exists but is not referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so every parameter has a description. The tool description does not add any info beyond the schema; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Search') and resource ('records in an Odoo model'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'read_records' (read by ID) and 'count_records'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'read_records' or 'count_records'. The description does not mention context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/twtrubiks/odoo19-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server