A
licenseC
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI agents to orchestrate Google Flow video and image generation, including multi-scene planning, silent background generation, credit tracking, and video stitching via MCP.
25
MIT
google-flow
by twofxz
Related Servers
Alternatives to google-flow
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents control Google Flow for generating images and videos using the user's own Google account. It provides tools for image generation, video creation, character and scene management, and UI discovery.171MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents from an MCP client to control Google Flow through a signed-in Chrome session, generating videos and images with Veo, Nano Banana, and Omni while managing projects, assets, scenes, characters, and shot lists with spending-approval guards and a sandboxed file vault.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to control Google Flow for image and video generation using your own Google account.137 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive Google Flow through a real Chrome profile to generate images, videos, characters, and scenes without sharing credentials.198 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor to generate images and videos through Google Flow using a local, already signed-in Chrome session. It runs as a local MCP endpoint so assistants can submit generation jobs, manage them, and receive results using your own Flow subscription credits.1MIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
flow_status is clearly a connection/auth check, while generate_image and generate_video are distinct media generation operations with no overlap in intent. An agent can confidently separate status verification from content creation.
Naming Consistency3/5
generate_image and generate_video follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, but flow_status breaks the convention by leading with the noun and using a different style. The mixed pattern is readable but not fully uniform.
Tool Count4/5
At 3 tools, the surface is small but appropriately scoped for a focused media generation server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose and there is no bloat, though the set could slightly expand to cover more workflow steps.
Completeness3/5
The core generation capabilities for images and videos are present, and the status check covers connection state. However, there are notable gaps: no way to list, retrieve, cancel, or manage generation jobs/results beyond local saving.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues