Get ONES Requirement Related Wiki Pages By Ref

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, so no contradiction. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond purpose; it does not disclose potential edge cases, rate limits, or what happens if the ref is not found. However, it is consistent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no extraneous words. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's purpose and parameter intent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple parameter, annotations, and presence of an output schema, the description covers the essential aspects. It could hint at the nature of the output (e.g., list of page references), but 'discover wiki page references' is adequate for a read-only lookup tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter 'ref' with 0% description coverage. The description compensates fully by explaining that 'ref' can be a requirement number, task id, or task URL, providing essential semantic context for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Discover') and clearly identifies the resource ('wiki page references') and the input types (requirement number, task id, task URL). It distinguishes from sibling 'get_related_wiki_pages' by the '_by_ref' suffix and parameter focus.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a reference (ref) is available, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_related_wiki_pages' or other lookup tools. No exclusion criteria are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.