Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FSV

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform authorized security testing and penetration testing operations including SSL/TLS analysis, port scanning, vulnerability scanning, and HTTP security header audits through natural language interactions.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform defensive security tasks such as vulnerability detection, CVE lookup, phishing/link safety checks, and security report generation via MCP tools.
      23
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language-driven security testing by orchestrating multiple pen-testing tools through MCP, with automated scan execution and AI-assisted vulnerability summarization.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to drive OWASP ZAP for authorized penetration testing and bug-bounty workflows, including authenticated scans and vulnerability triage through 67 curated safety-gated tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to conduct penetration testing and offensive security workflows, including reconnaissance, exploitation, post-exploitation, threat intelligence, malware analysis, forensics, and reporting through MCP tools. It supports session management, C2, evasion, credential attacks, and many specialized security testing capabilities.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates OWASP ZAP security testing with AI assistants through MCP, enabling automated vulnerability scanning and AI-powered security analysis during development. Supports multiple scan types including active, passive, and AJAX spider scans with real-time status updates.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    fsv_scan, fsv_quick_check, and fsv_waf_check overlap because quick_check and waf_check are essentially subsets of scan's passive profile. fsv_fixes also overlaps with fsv_get_report's fix-* formats. Descriptions clarify the intended distinctions, but an agent still has to judge which nested tool to use.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent fsv_ prefix and snake_case, which is predictable. Most follow action_object, but fsv_quick_check, fsv_waf_check, fsv_target_trend, fsv_fixes, fsv_triage, and fsv_scan_stats deviate from a strict verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within a reasonable range for a vulnerability scanner and covers distinct lifecycle stages: scanning, reporting, scan history, comparison, trend analysis, triage, remediation, stats, module listing, and ownership verification. The set is scoped without obvious bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core scan lifecycle from ownership verification through scanning, reporting, triage, remediation, and historical comparison. Minor gaps exist around scan cancellation/deletion, scheduled scans, and direct finding retrieval outside reports, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues