penpot_unlock_file_snapshot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the effect (unlocking allows deletion), the precondition (must be locked), and the authorization (creator-only). This provides sufficient transparency for a simple unlock operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short, clear sentences with no redundant information. Every word serves a purpose: verb, resource, effect, and constraint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the purpose, effect, and authorization. It lacks details on return values or error scenarios, but these are likely standard for similar operations. Overall adequate for the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter `snapshotId` has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description does not elaborate on its meaning beyond the name. The agent would benefit from knowing it is the ID of the snapshot to unlock, but the description does not add any value over the field name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the exact action (unlock), resource (previously locked user-created snapshot), and a key constraint (only creator can unlock). It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like lock_file_snapshot and delete_file_snapshot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states that unlocking allows the snapshot to be deleted, implying usage before a delete operation. It also identifies the authorization condition (creator-only). However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use or compare with alternatives, though the sibling tool list provides context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.