place_groww_bracket_order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states that the order includes a stop loss and target, but does not outline side effects, prerequisites (e.g., authenticated broker), multi-leg order behavior, or error conditions. This is a significant gap for a trading mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and front-loaded with the key action and context. No redundant or verbose language, making it easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what the tool returns, how the bracket order is structured (e.g., linked stop-loss and target orders), or any preconditions. While the schema covers parameter meaning, the overall context for a complex trading operation is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% parameter coverage with descriptions for all 10 parameters. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already spells out, so it meets the baseline but does not exceed it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Place Bracket Order') and the specific platform ('on Groww'), and adds the key clarification 'order with stop loss and target'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like place_groww_cover_order or place_groww_gtd_order.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage context is implied by 'on Groww', indicating this is for placing bracket orders specifically on the Groww broker. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this instead of the generic place_bracket_order or other Groww-specific order tools, nor does it mention any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.