Logout TunnelHub

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, which the description aligns with by implying session removal. The description adds value by specifying it can target 'current or a specific saved' session, clarifying scope beyond what annotations provide. However, it doesn't detail effects like authentication loss or rate limits, leaving some behavioral aspects uncovered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the core action without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded with the main purpose, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly. Every part of the sentence earns its place by specifying the tool's scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (destructive session management), annotations cover safety (destructive, idempotent) but lack output schema. The description adds basic scope but misses details like return values, error conditions, or dependencies on other tools. It's minimally adequate but has clear gaps for a mutation tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 1 parameter with 0% description coverage, and the description doesn't explain the 'sessionId' parameter's meaning or usage. Since schema coverage is low, the description should compensate but fails to do so, offering no param details. The baseline is 3 because the description doesn't contradict the schema but adds no semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and resource ('current or a specific saved TunnelHub session'), making the purpose evident. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_sessions_tunnelhub' or 'switch_environment_tunnelhub', which also involve session management, so it doesn't fully distinguish itself from alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., needing an active session from 'login_tunnelhub'), exclusions, or compare it to siblings like 'switch_environment_tunnelhub' for session changes. This leaves the agent without context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.