Skip to main content
Glama
tunedforai

x402 crypto market structure

by tunedforai

Related Servers

Alternatives to x402 crypto market structure

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Real-time crypto intelligence for AI agents. Technical analysis, liquidation heatmaps, sentiment, and funding rates for 50+ Hyperliquid perpetuals via x402 micropayments.
      15
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only crypto perps microstructure for AI agents: normalized cross-exchange market state (funding + multi-year percentile, OI, volume, CVD, order-book imbalance, liquidations, basis), OHLCV, 15-min state history, and measured conditional outcomes (historical base rates, not predictions) — 6 assets across Binance, Bybit, OKX and Hyperliquid, every metric with self-declared coverage and freshness
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides real-time crypto whale trade data and market analysis to AI agents, including unusual flow radar, liquidations, funding rates, and market snapshots across 15 exchanges and on-chain DEXs.
      17
      8 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Real-time perp market-data for AI trading agents — funding rates, funding-arb signals, open interest, volume, orderbook depth/slippage and oracle families across 25 venues, plus HIP-3 RWA coverage (tokenized stocks, metals, oil) that mainstream aggregators lack. x402-native pay-per-call (USDC on Base): one free funding screener tool + 11 paid tools with auto-pay.
      12
      15 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, such as addressRisk for wallet analysis and apiInfo for API details, but the market-related tools (marketAnalyze, marketFull, marketOrderflow, marketSnapshot) have some overlap in providing market data, which could cause confusion. However, their descriptions help clarify specific focuses like orderflow vs. snapshot.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: history tools use a consistent pattern (history1d, history1h, history5m), but market tools vary (marketAnalyze, marketFull, marketOrderflow, marketSnapshot), and others like addressRisk and apiInfo use different styles. This lacks a unified verb_noun convention, though names remain readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the count is well-scoped for a crypto market structure server, covering risk assessment, API info, historical data at multiple resolutions, and various market analyses. Each tool earns its place without feeling excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers key aspects of crypto market analysis, including risk, API access, historical data, and real-time market insights. Minor gaps might exist, such as lack of tools for portfolio management or advanced trading actions, but core workflows for data retrieval and analysis are well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues