Skip to main content
Glama
tumf

mcp-text-editor

by tumf
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-text-editor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Text Editor Server

      fastmcp-me
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides line-oriented text file editing capabilities through a standardized API. Optimized for LLM tools with efficient partial file access to minimize token usage.
      MIT

    • mcp-hashline-edit-server

      Submersible
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides hashline-based file editing using line-addressed edits and content hashes for integrity verification. It enables LLMs to perform precise file modifications while ensuring edits are rejected if the file content has changed since the last read.
      7 npm
      9
      MIT

    • RBT Document Editor

      leo7nel23
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables efficient editing of RBT documents with structured operations that read and modify specific sections or blocks. Reduces LLM token consumption by 80-95% compared to full file operations through smart caching and partial document access.
      8
      MIT

    • MCP File Editor Server

      pwilkin
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive file operations including reading, writing, searching, and editing files with advanced features like regex-based replacements, line-specific modifications, and directory-wide search capabilities. Provides 8 robust tools for safe file manipulation with content verification and detailed error handling.
      8
      23 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: create, read, append, insert, delete range, and patch. However, patch_text_file_contents can be seen as overlapping with insert and delete since patches may subsume those operations, so agents might occasionally hesitate between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_text_file_contents pattern, which is clear and consistent. The exception is create_text_file, which drops the _contents suffix and breaks the otherwise uniform convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped set for a text file editor. Each tool covers a necessary primitive operation without redundant or bloated additions.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides create, read, append, insert, delete-range, and patch operations, covering the core editing lifecycle. A whole-file overwrite or file deletion operation is missing, but most workflows can be accomplished with the existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources