Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-server-polymarket

mcp-server-polymarket

List recent Perps trades

list_perps_trades
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve public trades for a perpetual-futures instrument, newest first, and set start and end times to narrow the window or access older trades.

Instructions

Public trades of an instrument, newest first, up to 100 per call. Narrow the window with start and end to go further back.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "instrument_id": "<instrument_id>"
    },
    "name": "list_perps_trades"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
endNoISO 8601 time, e.g. 2026-11-01 or 2026-11-01T12:00:00Z, or epoch seconds.
startNoISO 8601 time, e.g. 2026-11-01 or 2026-11-01T12:00:00Z, or epoch seconds.
instrument_idYesPerps instrument id, e.g. 1.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noteNo
countNo
itemsNo
has_moreNo
next_cursorNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, open-world behavior, so the bar is lower; the description still adds real context beyond them by disclosing ordering (newest first) and the 100-record cap per call, which shapes how an agent pages. It omits whether start/end are inclusive and what happens when the window is omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler; the ordering and cap come first, followed by the paging instruction. Every clause conveys operational information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and annotations are rich, so the description needn't explain return values. What is provided covers scope, ordering, cap, and paging, leaving only default-window behavior and sibling differentiation unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and already documents the ISO 8601/epoch formats and instrument id. The description adds meaning the schema does not carry: that start and end exist specifically to page backward through history, tying the parameters to a retrieval strategy rather than just types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource ('Public trades of an instrument'), ordering ('newest first'), and result cap ('up to 100 per call'). It does not explicitly differentiate itself from near-siblings such as list_perps_public_fills or list_trades, so an agent must infer the distinction from the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives actionable usage for the time filters ('Narrow the window with start and end to go further back'), which is effectively the pagination instruction. It offers no when-to-use versus alternatives guidance and no exclusion of sibling listing tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.