Bitbucket MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Bitbucket MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for the Bitbucket Cloud REST API v2.0 that enables AI assistants to browse workspaces, repositories, and review pull requests.38 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.2712 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.195,589 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Bitbucket Cloud that enables reading and managing pull requests, comments, and descriptions via MCP clients.17-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides tools for interacting with Bitbucket repositories, pull requests, issues, and more.38 npmISC
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to read repositories and source code from Bitbucket. Provides tools for listing workspaces and repositories, browsing directories, reading files, searching code, and inspecting commits and pull requests.12-
TDQS
Scored across 38 tools
Several tools have overlapping purposes, such as bb_get_diff vs bb_get_pull_request_diff, bb_get_diffstat vs bb_get_pull_request_diffstat, and bb_get_pr_commits vs bb_get_commits. While descriptions provide some clarity, an agent could easily select the wrong tool when looking for diff or commit information.
The naming follows a consistent 'bb_verb_noun' pattern, with plural nouns for list operations and singular for single items. However, there is inconsistency in abbreviation: 'pr' is used in some tools (bb_get_pr_commits) while 'pull_request' is fully written out in others (bb_get_pull_request), creating minor confusion.
With 38 tools, the server far exceeds the 25-tool threshold, making the set feel bloated. Many tools are highly specific read operations (e.g., bb_get_merge_base, bb_get_comment_thread), which may overwhelm agents and increase selection difficulty.
The tool set is entirely read-only, with no create, update, delete, or comment operations for repositories, pull requests, or issues. This is a significant gap for a Bitbucket MCP server, as agents cannot perform common workflows like creating PRs, commenting on code, or managing issues.