mcp-server-whois
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-whois
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform real-time WHOIS and RDAP lookups, domain availability checks, and TLD infrastructure exploration using native protocols without API keys.8MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform WHOIS lookups to retrieve domain registration details, including ownership, registration dates, and availability status without requiring browser searches.415 npm21MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to check domain availability, perform batch domain lookups, and generate intelligent domain name suggestions across multiple TLDs using WHOIS integration.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceDomain intelligence for DNS, WHOIS/RDAP, SSL/TLS, subdomain discovery, availability, valuation, email security, and typosquatting and brand protection.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows AI agents to perform WHOIS lookups, enabling users to directly ask the AI about domain availability, ownership, registration details, and other domain information.4243 npm60MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform real-time domain name availability checks and validate domain syntax according to RFC standards. It supports both stdio and SSE transports to bridge the gap between AI models and domain registration services.1-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one fetches raw WHOIS data, the other analyzes registration lifecycle details from that data. There is no practical overlap or ambiguity in when to use each.
Both names use snake_case, but the pattern is inconsistent: 'raw_whois_lookup' is a noun phrase while 'analyze_registration_lifecycle' follows a verb-noun structure. The names are still readable and descriptive, but they do not share a uniform convention.
Two tools is on the thin end of the spectrum for a WHOIS-focused server. The pair covers raw lookup and one analysis function, which is borderline but arguably sufficient for a narrow use case.
The server provides raw WHOIS retrieval and expiry/creation analysis, but lacks common operations such as structured/parsed WHOIS output, registrar information, nameserver details, or domain availability checks. Agents needing standard WHOIS data beyond registration lifecycle would have to do their own parsing and may hit dead ends.