Skip to main content
Glama
tudadada

mcp-server-valuation

README.md
# mcp-server-valuation

[![npm version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/mcp-server-valuation.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-server-valuation)
[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[![MCP](https://img.shields.io/badge/MCP-Protocol-blue)](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for multi-asset valuation, M&A deal metrics, and enterprise digital asset appraisal.

---

## ⚡ Features & Tools

- **`value_digital_asset`**: Calculates valuation models for digital assets, premium domains, and web properties based on liquid floors and enterprise multiples.
- **`calc_ebitda_multiple`**: Calculates target acquisition value based on annual revenue/EBITDA and industry-standard multiples.

---

## 🚀 Quick Start (Running with AI Clients)

### Claude Desktop Integration

Add this snippet to your `claude_desktop_config.json`:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "valuation": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-server-valuation"]
    }
  }
}
```

### Cursor IDE / Windsurf Integration

Under MCP Settings, add a new stdio transport:
- **Command:** `npx -y mcp-server-valuation`

---

## 📦 Local Installation & Development

```bash
npm install -g mcp-server-valuation
```

Or run directly via stdio:
```bash
npx mcp-server-valuation
```

---

## 📄 License

MIT License. Developed for the global AI agent ecosystem.

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The two tools target somewhat different resources: value_digital_asset focuses on domains/web properties, while calc_ebitda_multiple computes acquisition value from EBITDA. However, both involve valuation multiples, which could cause occasional confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

Both names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, but one uses the full verb 'value' while the other abbreviates 'calc', a minor deviation.

Tool Count3/5

Only two tools for a valuation server feels thin; the domain likely supports several more methods, making the count borderline but not unreasonable for a highly focused server.

Completeness2/5

The surface covers only digital asset valuation and EBITDA multiple calculation, missing common approaches like DCF, comparable companies, and revenue multiples. These gaps would cause failures for many general valuation requests.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues