mcp-server-domain-valuation
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| calculate_domain_valuationC | Calculates deep financial valuation model for a domain name based on TLD tier, character length, commercial liquid floor, and enterprise upside. |
| compare_sales_multipliersC | Returns market valuation multiples across top TLDs (.com, .ai, .io, .org, ccTLDs) based on historical secondary market liquidity. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have distinct purposes: one computes a valuation for a specific domain, the other returns market multiplier benchmarks by TLD. They complement rather than overlap, though both sit in the valuation space and an agent might occasionally conflate 'valuation model' with 'market multiples'.
Both tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (calculate_domain_valuation, compare_sales_multipliers) with consistent snake_case. Naming is fully predictable.
Two tools is thin for a domain-valuation server; a valuation workflow typically needs inputs, benchmarks, and comparison operations. It's borderline rather than broken, but feels under-scoped.
The surface covers a single valuation calculation plus TLD multipliers, but lacks obvious operations like batch valuation, historical/comparable sales lookup, or TLD listing. Agents can work around it but will hit dead ends for richer analyses.