The two tools target clearly distinct evaluation dimensions: brand quality heuristics versus category/trademark risk screening. There is no apparent overlap in purpose, so an agent can easily select the correct tool.

Both tool names use a consistent snake_case, verb-first convention: evaluate_brand_quality and screen_category_vs_trademark. The pattern is predictable and readable.

Two tools is thin for a domain evaluator, as it likely needs additional checks such as availability, length, TLD suitability, or SEO considerations. The count is borderline rather than clearly appropriate.

The surface covers brand quality and trademark screening but omits other common domain evaluation operations like availability, extension checks, length scoring, or bulk evaluation. These gaps are notable for the stated server purpose.