domain-radar
Related Servers
Alternatives to domain-radar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceDomain intelligence for DNS, WHOIS/RDAP, SSL/TLS, subdomain discovery, availability, valuation, email security, and typosquatting and brand protection.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for IntoDNS.ai providing 36 free tools for DNS, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI, DNSSEC, MTA-STS, FCrDNS, blacklist and email security checks. Citation-grade report snapshots with content hashes. No API key required.45262 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThe official WhoisXML API MCP server: 32 first-party tools for WHOIS, DNS, IP geolocation, threat intel, typosquatting, email verification, and native bulk — in Claude, Cursor, VS Code, or any MCP client.151 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for DNS lookups, reverse DNS, WHOIS, and domain checks. Zero auth, zero config.555 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server providing automated domain valuation, authoritative WHOIS lookup, and comparable sales analysis for AI agents3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for checking domain name availability via RDAP and WHOIS fallback, supporting single and bulk domain lookups.5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one audits a keyword across a fixed set of TLDs, while the other generates and checks new keyword combinations. There is no meaningful overlap that could confuse an agent.
Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern: scan_keyword_tlds and find_available_combinations. The pattern is predictable and consistent.
With only 2 tools, the server feels somewhat thin for a domain-radar service, but the two tools cover a coherent narrow workflow: auditing a keyword and discovering available variations. The count is borderline but not unreasonable.
The set covers basic keyword auditing and combination discovery, but lacks broader domain intelligence features like bulk lookups, registration monitoring, or detailed WHOIS data. It is adequate for a simple keyword-to-availability workflow but has notable gaps for a 'radar' concept.