Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to domain-radar

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Domain intelligence for DNS, WHOIS/RDAP, SSL/TLS, subdomain discovery, availability, valuation, email security, and typosquatting and brand protection.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for IntoDNS.ai providing 36 free tools for DNS, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI, DNSSEC, MTA-STS, FCrDNS, blacklist and email security checks. Citation-grade report snapshots with content hashes. No API key required.
      45
      262 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      The official WhoisXML API MCP server: 32 first-party tools for WHOIS, DNS, IP geolocation, threat intel, typosquatting, email verification, and native bulk — in Claude, Cursor, VS Code, or any MCP client.
      151 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DNS lookups, reverse DNS, WHOIS, and domain checks. Zero auth, zero config.
      5
      55 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing automated domain valuation, authoritative WHOIS lookup, and comparable sales analysis for AI agents
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for checking domain name availability via RDAP and WHOIS fallback, supporting single and bulk domain lookups.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one audits a keyword across a fixed set of TLDs, while the other generates and checks new keyword combinations. There is no meaningful overlap that could confuse an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern: scan_keyword_tlds and find_available_combinations. The pattern is predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels somewhat thin for a domain-radar service, but the two tools cover a coherent narrow workflow: auditing a keyword and discovering available variations. The count is borderline but not unreasonable.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers basic keyword auditing and combination discovery, but lacks broader domain intelligence features like bulk lookups, registration monitoring, or detailed WHOIS data. It is adequate for a simple keyword-to-availability workflow but has notable gaps for a 'radar' concept.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues