Skip to main content
Glama
tudadada

actionlog

by tudadada
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to actionlog

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-receipts

      yulinlina
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides append-only, tamper-evident local receipts for AI agent actions, capturing command executions, outputs, and handoff evidence.
      MIT

    • GoLogX (logx-mcp)

      AyoubTadlaoui
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Tamper-evident audit logging for AI agents. Append-only, hash-chained, optionally Ed25519-signed log. The MCP server lets an agent keep and verify a record of what it actually did.
      7
      MIT

    • agent-audit-trail

      dtjohnson83
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing immutable audit logging, policy enforcement, and compliance reporting for AI agent workflows, enabling regulatory compliance and chain integrity verification.
      MIT

    • QuantaOptima

      jdhart81
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides cryptographic audit trails for AI agent actions, making every action tamper-evident via HMAC-SHA256 signed hash chains.
      10
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one appends an action to the log, the other verifies the log's integrity. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their intended usage.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern (record_agent_action, verify_log_integrity), are in snake_case, and clearly communicate the action and target. The naming is fully consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin even for a focused audit-logging purpose. While the count is not excessive, it falls at the low end where a single extra tool for retrieval would make the set feel more complete.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers the core record and verify capabilities, but there is no way to read, list, or query the logged actions. This creates a notable gap: an agent can write and validate entries but cannot retrieve them for normal use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources