Skip to main content
Glama
tuan-cre

hypr-mcp

by tuan-cre
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to hypr-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Wayland MCP Server

      kurojs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate Wayland desktop environments through screenshot analysis, mouse control, and keyboard input simulation. It supports visual context via VLM providers like Gemini and OpenRouter to perform complex, multi-step desktop actions.
      10
      GPL 3.0

    • hyprland-mcp

      Keylessboi
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a Hyprland Wayland desktop by listing windows, capturing screenshots, and sending input to a dedicated agent workspace without disrupting the user's screen.
      -

    • hyprcu

      angusforbes
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control Hyprland desktops via MCP, including pointer/keyboard input, screenshots, launching apps, and natural-language window targeting using a local decision model.
      14
      1
      MIT

    • astra-linux-agent

      novique-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to see and control a Linux desktop via Wayland/Hyprland, providing screenshots, structured desktop state, pointer/keyboard input, semantic window/workspace tools, and a policy engine for safe execution.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action. Overlapping categories (type_text, key_press, paste_text) are clearly differentiated by use case, and OCR tools (find_text_on_screen, wait_text, click_text) have precise roles. No ambiguity that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_monitors, switch_workspace, mouse_click, clipboard_write). The verbs are predictable and the naming is uniform, making the set highly readable and navigable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 27 tools, the count exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. While the domain is broad (window management, input, OCR, clipboard), the tool surface feels heavy and could potentially be consolidated. The scope justifies many tools, but the sheer number edges into over-provisioning.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers window lifecycle, workspace switching, input control, OCR, clipboard, and screenshots. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no minimize or workspace creation), but core automation workflows are fully supported, and agents can accomplish most tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources