A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for Apple Notes enabling read, search, write, and sync of notes with high fidelity, including styles, attachments, and bidirectional Markdown sync.
13
MIT
Apple Notes MCP
by tszaks
Related Servers
Alternatives to Apple Notes MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for macOS Apple apps. Enables read/write access to Notes, Reminders, Calendar, Contacts, and Safari using SQLite and JXA, all running locally.42816 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables reading and writing Apple Notes and Reminders directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for macOS that provides async, cache-backed access and background queued writes to Apple Notes. It enables seamless integration for reading, creating, and managing notes through standard tools like ScriptingBridge while supporting background service execution.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLM agents to list, read, create, update, delete, and search Apple Notes on macOS.67 npmAGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Bear notes via CloudKit. Full CRUD, tags, search, TODOs, attachments, and a context library for curated LLM knowledge bases.3564MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 14 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: accounts, folders, notes, and attachments are separate concerns. There is mild overlap between list_notes, search_notes, and get_recent_notes, but the descriptions scope them well enough for an agent to choose correctly.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools share the notes_ prefix and follow a verb_noun pattern: list_, get_, search_, create_, update_, delete_, move_, append_to_. The naming is highly predictable and consistent across the entire set.
Tool Count5/5
14 tools is well within the ideal range for a domain-specific MCP server. Each tool covers a meaningful operation on Apple Notes without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.
Completeness4/5
The core note lifecycle is well covered: create, read, update, append, move, search, list, and delete. Minor gaps exist around folder rename/update and attachments being metadata-only, but these are not severe dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues