Skip to main content
Glama
tskovlund

mcp-score

by tskovlund
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-score

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MuseScore MCP Server

      ghchen99
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides programmatic control over MuseScore through a WebSocket-based plugin system, allowing AI assistants to compose music, add lyrics, navigate scores, and control MuseScore directly.
      91
      MIT

    • rhythm-vibe-studio

      bolabaden
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      MCP server for vibe coding with music, enabling format conversion (LilyPond, MusicXML, MIDI, ABC, etc.), audio-to-sheet transcription, and transposition with robust fallback outputs.
      1
      -

    • Music21 Composer MCP

      viktorkelemen
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A composition-focused server built on music21 for generative music workflows, enabling melody generation, musical transformations, chord reharmonization, counterpoint creation, and MIDI export through constraint-based algorithmic composition tools.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose. Connect/disconnect tools are separated by app, editing tools target specific musical elements (chord symbols, rehearsal marks, tempo, key signature, barline), and read tools are differentiated by scope (whole score info, single measure, range). No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores, and most editing tools include 'live'. Minor deviations: 'ping_score_app' omits 'live', and 'undo_last_action' is generic, but overall the pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    18 tools is well-scoped for a score-editing assistant covering three applications. Each tool serves a distinct operation without redundancy, and the count supports a reasonably complete workflow without being overwhelming.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers core editing operations (add elements, set parameters, transpose, undo) and connects to three major apps. However, it lacks features like note input, dynamics, articulations, or selection-based editing beyond reading properties. Notable gaps limit some agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources