Skip to main content
Glama
trustxai

amazing-binance-mcp

by trustxai

binance_get_fiat_orders

Read-onlyIdempotent

List fiat deposit or withdrawal orders (bank transfers, card top-ups) within a specific time window to reconcile individual transactions. Use for targeted lookups, not bulk backfills.

Instructions

List fiat-rail deposit or withdraw orders (bank transfer/card top-up of the fiat wallet).

Calls GET /sapi/v1/fiat/orders, signed. This is the UID-weighted 45000 fiat-rail ledger — of the 180000/min UID budget that is at most 4 calls per minute. Do not poll this tool in a loop; for a bulk backfill use binance_get_fiat_history, which already budgets calls.

When to Use:

  • Seeing fiat bank-rail deposits into, or withdrawals out of, the fiat wallet (bank transfer, SEPA, card-funded top-ups of the fiat balance — not Spot).

  • Reconciling a specific order by scanning a narrow begin_time/end_time window.

When NOT to Use:

  • Buying/selling crypto with fiat (a card or bank purchase of BTC/ETH/...) — use binance_get_fiat_payments.

  • A long backfill across many pages or months — use binance_get_fiat_history.

  • Binance Card spend — there is no API for that (see the module docstring).

Returns: A markdown list (or JSON with response_format="json") of orders: order number, fiat currency, indicated vs settled amount, fee, method, status, created/updated time. Status values Binance returns: Processing, Failed, Successful, Finished, Refunding, Refunded, Refund Failed, Order Partial credit Stopped.

Pagination: page (1-indexed) / rows (max 500) map directly to the API; the response also reports Binance's own total row count across all pages. Markdown display is capped at 50 rows (with a note naming the next page to request); JSON keeps the full page.

Examples: params = {"transaction_type": "deposit", "rows": 50} params = {"transaction_type": "withdraw", "begin_time": "2026-01-01", "end_time": "2026-02-01"}

Error Handling: A 200 body with success: false is raised by the client as BinanceEnvelopeError and surfaced here as Error: ...; an undocumented span cap on this endpoint typically surfaces as -1127 — narrow begin_time/end_time and retry. A malformed begin_time/end_time returns Error: <field> must be epoch milliseconds or an ISO-8601 string without calling the API.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paramsYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint false), the description discloses rate limits (4 calls/min), signed API requirement, pagination behavior, error handling (BinanceEnvelopeError, -1127), and return format details, offering rich behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections, front-loads the core purpose and critical rate limit, and every sentence provides actionable information without fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It covers all essential aspects for correct invocation: API endpoint, rate limits, use cases, alternatives, pagination, return format, status values, and error handling, making it self-sufficient for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Even though schema description coverage is 0%, the description explains parameter usage through examples and inline notes: begin/end time formats, transaction_type mapping, pagination semantics, and the default 30-day window, adding value beyond the schema's own descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists fiat-rail deposit or withdraw orders, and explicitly differentiates from sibling tools like binance_get_fiat_payments and binance_get_fiat_history, making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It has dedicated 'When to Use' and 'When NOT to Use' sections that name specific alternatives and conditions, such as using binance_get_fiat_history for bulk backfills and binance_get_fiat_payments for crypto purchases, providing explicit guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools