Skip to main content
Glama
trustxai
by trustxai

Related Servers

Alternatives to airbyte-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Apache Airflow for querying DAGs, monitoring execution, and troubleshooting failures.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to interact with Apache Airflow orchestration platform through natural language to query pipeline statuses, troubleshoot DAG failures, trigger DAGs, and analyze configurations.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Baserow databases, supporting workspace, database, table, and row operations with authentication and batch capabilities.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes with detailed descriptions. However, the multiple job- and log-related tools (e.g., airbyte_get_job, airbyte_get_job_details, airbyte_get_job_logs, airbyte_get_attempt_logs, airbyte_list_jobs, airbyte_list_jobs_internal) could confuse an agent despite the clarifications. The overlap is manageable but not perfect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'airbyte_' + verb (cancel, create, get, list, trigger, update, wait_for) + noun. Naming is uniform, uses snake_case, and no mixing of conventions. Very predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 36 tools, the server covers a wide range of Airbyte operations thoroughly. While slightly numerous, each tool serves a specific, justified need in managing the data pipeline lifecycle. The count is appropriate for the comprehensive scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers most major workflows (CRUD for sources, destinations, connections; job management; triggering syncs and refreshes). However, notable gaps exist: there are no tools to delete sources, destinations, or connections, which are missing CRUD operations. This limits the completeness of lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues