Skip to main content
Glama
truecallerabreham

mcp-server-digitalocean

create_droplet

Create a new DigitalOcean Droplet by specifying its name, region, size, and image. Optionally add SSH keys and tags.

Instructions

Create a new Droplet. Specify name, region, size, and image.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesHuman-readable name for the Droplet
sizeYesSize slug (e.g., 's-1vcpu-1gb', 's-2vcpu-4gb')
tagsNoOptional array of tag names
imageYesImage slug or ID (e.g., 'ubuntu-24-04-x64')
regionYesRegion slug (e.g., 'nyc1', 'sfo3', 'lon1')
ssh_keysNoOptional array of SSH key IDs to add
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate a mutating operation (readOnlyHint=false), but description adds no behavioral details such as side effects, billing implications, or return value. Without an output schema, more transparency is warranted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no filler, front-loaded with the action 'Create'. Could be more structured but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters and no output schema, the description is too sparse. Does not mention optional parameters (tags, ssh_keys) or any return behavior, leaving gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already documented. The description merely lists the required parameters, adding no extra meaning. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new Droplet and lists the key required parameters (name, region, size, image). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_droplet or list_droplets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_domain. Lacks context about prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/truecallerabreham/mcp-server-digitalocean'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server