Skip to main content
Glama
trtmn

TestRail MCP Server

by trtmn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to TestRail MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • testmo-mcp

      strelec00
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connect Claude, Cursor, and other AI assistants to your Testmo test management instance to manage test cases, folders, runs, milestones, and CI/CD automation.
      45
      2
      MIT

    • TestCollab MCP Server

      TCSoftInc
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding assistants to TestCollab for managing test cases, plans, and suites directly through natural language. It enables users to create, update, and query testing resources within integrated development environments and AI chat clients.
      20
      11 npm
      4
      MIT

    • TestRail MCP Server

      Derrbal
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with TestRail test management systems through comprehensive API integration. Supports retrieving and updating test cases, projects, suites, runs, and results, plus adding attachments and managing test data through natural language commands.
      18
      14 npm
      MIT

    • testrail-ai-mcp

      jagreehal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to answer QA questions in a single call, covering run reports, failure grouping by root cause, flaky versus regressed test detection, and coverage gaps. Also exposes raw TestRail API access when a question needs it.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: browsing API categories, verifying auth, describing methods, executing commands, and searching test cases. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case. The prefix `testrail` is used uniformly where applicable, and `search_test_cases` follows the same convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 5 tools, the count is slightly low for a full TestRail integration, but the generic API runner covers many operations. The set feels appropriately scoped for a minimal yet functional server.

    Completeness4/5

    While dedicated tools for common operations are missing, the `run_testrail_command` combined with `browse_testrail_api` and `describe_testrail_method` allow execution of any TestRail API method, making the surface complete in practice.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources