profile_list
Retrieve all stored SIFS profiles to access and manage saved search configurations.
Instructions
List saved SIFS profiles.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve all stored SIFS profiles to access and manage saved search configurations.
List saved SIFS profiles.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only says 'List saved SIFS profiles,' which implies a read operation. No additional behavioral details like authorization needs or response format are provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, perfectly front-loaded. Highly concise for a simple list operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks explanation of what a 'SIFS profile' is and what the list returns (e.g., names, IDs), which could hinder an unfamiliar agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters present, so schema coverage is 100% and the description adds no further meaning. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate as no parameter explanation is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool lists saved SIFS profiles, which succinctly defines its purpose. It distinguishes from sibling 'profile_show' by implying a list operation vs. single profile retrieval.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'profile_show' or other tools. The agent receives no context on prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tristanmanchester/sifs'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server