Find the exact procedure requirements for each stage of a New Taipei interior renovation, based on your jurisdiction. Get source-bound answers to prepare permit documentation.
Return stage-specific New Taipei interior renovation procedure requirements.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| stage | Yes | ||
| jurisdiction | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.4.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond returning requirements. No mention of side effects, permissions, rate limits, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 10 words, front-loaded with purpose. Could add more specificity without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 2 required string parameters with no schema descriptions, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain parameter formats, valid values, or return structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage and no enums. The description does not explain the meaning or valid values for 'stage' or 'jurisdiction' parameters, leaving the agent with no guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns stage-specific New Taipei interior renovation procedure requirements, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling 'resolve_procedure_stage_confidence' which handles confidence, not requirements.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No context for prerequisites or required conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.