Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to RyRank

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A generic Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for high-accuracy document reranking using sentence-transformers (Cross-Encoder). Ideal for enhancing RAG and AI agent decision-making. sentence-transformers (Cross-Encoder) を使用して文書の関連度を再計算・ソートする汎用 MCP (Model Context Protocol) サーバー。
      1
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Crypto-native LLM gateway with OpenAI-compatible API and per-token USDC payments on Solana via the x402 protocol.
      10,440 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to optimize context-window attention by reordering retrieved documents so critical evidence lands at prompt boundaries, mitigating lost-in-the-middle degradation. It combines BM25 lexical scoring, dense vector similarity, reciprocal rank fusion, knowledge-graph expansion, and recency-decay memory caching, exposed as a zero-dependency MCP stdio server.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Pay-per-use clean web reader for AI agents. URL in, markdown plus metadata out, in milliseconds. Settled per-call in USDC over x402 — no signup, no API keys.
      1
      102 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With a single tool, there is no possibility of misselection; the one operation 'rerank' is unambiguous and its scope (per-call document reordering for a query) is clearly stated in the description.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single lowercase, snake_case-style verb name 'rerank' establishes no conflicting convention and matches the standard terminology of the reranking domain.

    Tool Count4/5

    The server is deliberately a one-endpoint reranking service, so one tool is defensible and well-scoped rather than bloated; however, a lone tool is on the thin side compared with typical multi-tool surfaces, leaving little room for related operations.

    Completeness4/5

    For a rerank-as-a-service API the core operation is fully covered, including the response shape and document limits. Minor gaps exist around auxiliary operations (e.g. model/version selection, usage or quota introspection), but none block the primary workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues