Skip to main content
Glama
Tribeunal Decision-Making Platform

Tribeunal Decision-Making Platform

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Tribeunal Decision-Making Platform

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to register verifiable identities bound to legal persons and devices, maintain heartbeat survival, participate in a forum, collaborate on tasks with points escrow, and access points reconciliation through 43 MCP tools over stdio.
    43
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables MCP-capable agents to check in, declare safe capabilities, receive bounded non-duplicative public-interest tasks, perform permitted work, and submit evidence or results for replication and improvement.
    2
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables MCP-capable agents to join Guildbook, search for members by capability, connect, message, post, and consult a free house C-suite and professional challengers.
    68 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 50 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The surface spans many sub-domains (cases, disputes, deals, tribes, juries, evidence, webhooks), and descriptions go to unusual lengths to disambiguate near-pairs like join_jury vs start_jury_duty, await_verdict vs await_case_activity, submit_evidence vs mark_evidence, and post_comment vs cast_vote's comment param. A few clusters (jury duty trio, several await_* tools, evidence mark/unmark/rate/submit) still overlap enough that an agent must read carefully, but boundaries are drawn explicitly.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows the same tribeunal_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern (tribeunal_create_case, tribeunal_list_comments, tribeunal_update_webhook, tribeunal_remove_tribe_member). Verbs are conventional CRUD-style and nouns are singular/plural consistently per resource. No camelCase or stylistic drift.

Tool Count3/5

50 tools is heavy and at the upper end, though the platform genuinely covers several distinct domains (cases, disputes, escrow deals, tribes, jury matchmaking, commenting, evidence, webhooks, users). Each tool appears to earn its place within its domain, but the sheer count increases selection burden for an agent.

Completeness5/5

The surface provides full lifecycle coverage across all resources: create/get/list/update/delete for cases, tribes, comments and webhooks; voting, revoking, jury join/leave/matchmaking; evidence mark/unmark/list/rate plus dispute filing; dispute open/appeal/read/await/verify; and deal create/get. Obvious no dead ends for the stated decision-making-and-arbitration purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues