Skip to main content
Glama
medusa-mcp
by trhonpavel

Related Servers

Alternatives to medusa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing WIBI's API v2 as tools, supporting OAuth 2.1 for production (Claude web/desktop) and stdio for local dev, enabling natural-language queries about campaigns, products, clients, reports, broadcasts, and subscriptions with per-commerce isolation and admin scope switching.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal local MCP server that wraps any Claude Messages API-compatible upstream into a unified ask_model tool. It enables MCP clients to interact with these models through a standard tool interface using stdio transport.
      1
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP clients to read feeds, search, browse full comment trees, and look up users, while performing guarded write actions like posting, replying, editing, voting, saving, and joining or leaving subreddits. Runs over stdio or HTTP with confirmation required for every write, dry-run previews, rate spacing, and hourly caps.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to access multiple stdio or Streamable HTTP MCP servers through one authenticated endpoint, enforcing OAuth bearer validation, per-client tool RBAC, rate limits, schema validation, audit logging, and tool-definition pinning.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Start, observe, and interact with Claude Managed Agents from any MCP client — launch an agent, watch its events, reply, approve the tools it wants to run, and stop it. Runs over stdio, HTTP, or AWS Lambda with pluggable auth.
      17
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 48 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Despite 48 tools, each targets a distinct resource-action pair. Fulfillment, payment, and return tool families are clearly delineated by verbs (create, mark, cancel, capture, refund, receive), and the generic medusa_request is explicitly a fallback. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set uses snake_case throughout with a dominant verb_noun pattern, but it mixes upsert conventions: some resources use save_* for create/update (save_collection, save_customer) while others use separate create_* and update_* (create_product, update_product). Two tools (sales_report, medusa_request) are noun-only, breaking the strict verb_noun pattern. This is mostly consistent but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    48 tools far exceeds the 16–25 'heavy' threshold and is close to the 50+ extreme. While the Medusa admin domain is broad, the count imposes high selection overhead; a generic medusa_request already provides an escape hatch, so many CRUD tools could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle coverage is strong for orders, products, variants, customers, categories, collections, inventory, price lists, and promotions. Notable gaps include no dedicated delete_customer or order edit/claim/exchange tools, but medusa_request lets agents work around these gaps, so the surface is largely complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues