Skip to main content
Glama

apply_hwp_paragraph_style

Apply paragraph alignment, indent, and line spacing to a specific paragraph in an HWPX document by specifying file path and paragraph index.

Instructions

Apply paragraph formatting (alignment·indent·line_spacing) to the Nth paragraph in an .hwpx. Adds a new paraPr to header.xml and retargets the paragraph's paraPrIDRef. align: LEFT|CENTER|RIGHT|JUSTIFY|DISTRIBUTE. Args: file_path, paragraph_index, align/indent/line_spacing (any subset), output_path (optional).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
file_pathYes
paragraph_indexYes
alignNo
indentNo
line_spacingNo
output_pathNo
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, description discloses internal mechanism (adds paraPr, retargets paraPrIDRef) implying file modification. Lacks mention of error handling or idempotency, but covers main behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two very concise sentences. First states overall purpose, second lists arguments with details. No unnecessary words; front-loaded with key action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main behavior and parameters well. Missing details on default behavior when output_path omitted, error conditions (e.g., invalid paragraph_index), and file permissions. Adequate given 6-param complexity and no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description explains all 6 parameters: specifies align enum values, notes 'any subset' of formatting options, and clarifies optionality of output_path. Adds meaning beyond raw schema types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'apply' and resource 'paragraph formatting' with specific attributes (alignment, indent, line_spacing) and target (Nth paragraph in .hwpx). Distinguishes from sibling `apply_hwp_text_style` by focusing on paragraph-level formatting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Lists arguments and their roles, including optionality and allowed align values. Does not explicitly compare with siblings or state when not to use, but provides sufficient guidance for parameter selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/treesoop/hwp-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server