get_session_attempts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden and largely fails: it never confirms this is a read-only operation, says nothing about result volume, pagination, or ordering for potentially many attempts. Only 'all attempts' hints at an unpaginated list return.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One efficient, front-loaded sentence with no filler. The phrase 'detailed information' is the only slightly vague element, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations and no output schema, the description should say what an 'attempt' object contains and whether the list is bounded. It covers the input scoping adequately but leaves the return shape and read-only nature undocumented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter is already documented as 'Session ID', so the description's 'for a specific session' adds nothing new. Baseline 3 applies; it does not explain where the session_id comes from (e.g., list_sessions).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('all attempts for a specific session'), which is clearly distinct from siblings like list_sessions or get_attempt_tasks. It stops short of explicitly distinguishing itself from get_attempt_tasks (which appears to drill one level deeper).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the scoping phrase 'for a specific session'; there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not or named alternative among the many siblings. An agent can infer this is the per-session attempt listing, but must guess how it relates to list_sessions and get_attempt_tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.