EvalKit MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to EvalKit MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables security researchers to evaluate AI system defenses against prompt injection attacks through a comprehensive set of test vectors and analysis tools.83-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables automated LLM red teaming by submitting asynchronous test runs, retrieving aggregated metrics, and accessing artifacts.4CC BY-SA 4.0

Trustwise MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides advanced evaluation tools for assessing AI safety, alignment, and performance of LLM outputs. Enables programmatic evaluation of quality, safety metrics like toxicity and PII detection, and operational metrics including carbon footprint and cost estimation.4Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAI red teaming toolkit exposed as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Connect any MCP client and test AI systems for safety vulnerabilities.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables deterministic security testing of AI agents that use tools by serving synthetic MCP environments with poisoned data, fake secrets, and privileged actions. Records agent tool calls and evaluates security invariants (e.g., canary leaks, forbidden access, approval binding) without an LLM judge or real systems.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAutomated red-teaming and reliability-auditing for AI agents, exposed as an MCP server. It attacks and scores agents for prompt injection, tool misuse, exfiltration, and unreliable behavior.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct evaluation function: robustness classification, query decomposition, obfuscation analysis, and server status. No overlap in purpose.
All tools share the 'eval_' prefix, but the suffixes vary in pattern (noun_noun for classifier_robustness, verb_noun for decompose_query, noun_noun for obfuscation_evasion, and single noun for status). Mostly consistent with minor deviation.
Four tools is well-scoped for an evaluation kit, covering multiple evaluation stages without excess or deficiency.
The set covers core evaluation operations and status checking, though a tool for retrieving historical results or configuring evaluations would round it out. Minor gap, not severe.