No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 50 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource+action pair, but several close neighbors exist: list_open_incidents vs list_incidents, list_runs vs get_run_history, get_agent_dependencies vs list_dependencies, and pause_monitor vs snooze_monitor. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect between run-listing or dependency tools without reading carefully.
The set overwhelmingly follows verb_noun snake_case (list_monitors, create_monitor, update_monitor, delete_monitor). Minor deviations include register_agent instead of create_agent, the awkward discover_monitors_reconcile, and one-off verbs like test_destination and declare_run_expectations.
50 tools is well into the heavy range, even for a broad monitoring platform. While the scope justifies many CRUD surfaces (monitors, incidents, agents, destinations, API keys, status pages), the count makes selection harder and bloats the context an agent must process.
The domain is covered thoroughly: monitors, incidents, routes/destinations, agents, API keys, status pages, runs, and telemetry all have lifecycle coverage. Minor gaps include no singleton get_destination or get_status_page (list + update/delete only) and no manual incident resolution, though that is likely automatic.
