cognee-mcp
Cognee MCP server exposes an AI memory engine over Model Context Protocol—store, search, and delete memory from any MCP client.
Store text or file uploads (base64, up to 10 MB) as permanent graph memory or fast session-cache memory via
remember, with optional background ingestion, custom extraction prompt, dataset scoping, and ontology selection.Search memory with
recall: natural-language queries, optional session ID, dataset filtering,top_k, and search-type overrides; returns summarized results with memory count/state metadata.Delete memory with
forget: by data ID, dataset name/ID, or everything owned.Check background ingestion progress with
cognify_status.Discover and call tools via
search_toolsandcall_tool; onlyremember,recall, andforgetare pinned by default.Run as an MCP server over stdio, SSE, or Streamable HTTP; supports direct local mode, Cognee Cloud mode, and API mode, plus agent-scoped datasets and per-dataset isolation.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@cognee-mcpingest my project documentation from the docs folder"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
cognee‑mcp - Run cognee’s memory engine as a Model Context Protocol server
Build memory for Agents and query from any client that speaks MCP – in your terminal or IDE.
✨ Features
Multiple transports – choose Streamable HTTP --transport http (recommended for web deployments), SSE --transport sse (real‑time streaming), or stdio (classic pipe, default)
Cloud Mode – connect to Cognee Cloud via
--serve-urlorCOGNEE_SERVICE_URLenv var (see Connection Modes)API Mode – connect to an already running Cognee FastAPI server (see Connection Modes)
Minimal Memory API – exposes only
remember,recall, andforgetfor agent memory workflowsIntegrated logging – all actions written to a rotating file (see get_log_file_location()) and mirrored to console in dev
Session-aware memory – store fast session cache entries or permanent graph memory through one
remembertoolFocused recall – query memory through one
recalltool with optional session and search controlsSimple deletion – remove a dataset or all owned memory through one
forgettool
Please refer to our documentation here for further information.
Related MCP server: remembrallmcp
🚀 Quick Start
Clone cognee repo
git clone https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee.gitNavigate to cognee-mcp subdirectory
cd cognee/cognee-mcpInstall uv if you don't have one
pip install uvInstall all the dependencies you need for cognee mcp server with uv
uv sync --dev --all-extras --reinstallActivate the virtual environment in cognee mcp directory
source .venv/bin/activateSet up your OpenAI API key in .env for a quick setup with the default cognee configurations
LLM_API_KEY="YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY"Run cognee mcp server with stdio (default)
python src/server.pyor stream responses over SSE
python src/server.py --transport sseor run with Streamable HTTP transport (recommended for web deployments)
python src/server.py --transport http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8000 --path /mcp
You can do more advanced configurations by creating .env file using our template. To use different LLM providers / database configurations, and for more info check out our documentation.
No API key? If your MCP host grants the
samplingcapability,LLM_PROVIDER="mcp-sampling"delegates completions to the host's own model, so noLLM_API_KEYis needed (embeddings still need a provider). Host support varies — as of early 2026 Claude Code does not yet grant sampling (anthropics/claude-code#1785). See the "MCP sampling" section of the .env template.
🐳 Docker Usage
If you'd rather run cognee-mcp in a container, you have two options:
Build locally
Make sure you are in /cognee root directory and have a fresh
.envcontaining only yourLLM_API_KEY(and your chosen settings).Remove any old image and rebuild:
docker rmi cognee/cognee-mcp:main || true docker build --no-cache -f cognee-mcp/Dockerfile -t cognee/cognee-mcp:main .Run it:
# For HTTP transport (recommended for web deployments) docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=http --env-file ./.env -p 8000:8000 --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main # For SSE transport docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse --env-file ./.env -p 8000:8000 --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main # For stdio transport (default) docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=stdio --env-file ./.env --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainInstalling optional dependencies at runtime:
You can install optional dependencies when running the container by setting the
EXTRASenvironment variable:# Install a single optional dependency group at runtime docker run \ -e TRANSPORT_MODE=http \ -e EXTRAS=aws \ --env-file ./.env \ -p 8000:8000 \ --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main # Install multiple optional dependency groups at runtime (comma-separated) docker run \ -e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \ -e EXTRAS=aws,postgres,neo4j \ --env-file ./.env \ -p 8000:8000 \ --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainAvailable optional dependency groups:
aws- S3 storage supportpostgres/postgres-binary- PostgreSQL database supportneo4j- Neo4j graph database supportneptune- AWS Neptune supportturso- Turso vector/graph store supportscraping- Web scraping capabilitieslangchain- LangChain integrationllama-index- LlamaIndex integrationanthropic- Anthropic modelsgroq- Groq modelsmistral- Mistral modelsollama/huggingface- Local model supportdocs- Document processingtracing- OpenTelemetry tracingredis- Redis supportAnd more (see pyproject.toml for full list)
Pull from Docker Hub (no build required):
The image is published to Docker Hub on every push to
main. If you have not cloned the repo, create the.envfile the run commands expect first — it needs at least your LLM key:# Pull the prebuilt image docker pull cognee/cognee-mcp:main # Create a minimal .env in the current directory (no repo checkout required) echo 'LLM_API_KEY="YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY"' > .env# With HTTP transport (recommended for web deployments) docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=http --env-file ./.env -p 8000:8000 --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main # With SSE transport docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse --env-file ./.env -p 8000:8000 --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main # With stdio transport (default) docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=stdio --env-file ./.env --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainWith runtime installation of optional dependencies:
# Install optional dependencies from Docker Hub image docker run \ -e TRANSPORT_MODE=http \ -e EXTRAS=aws,postgres \ --env-file ./.env \ -p 8000:8000 \ --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main
Important: Docker vs Direct Usage
Docker uses environment variables, not command line arguments:
✅ Docker:
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=http❌ Docker:
--transport http(won't work)
Direct Python usage uses command line arguments:
✅ Direct:
python src/server.py --transport http❌ Direct:
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=http(won't work)
Docker API Mode
To connect the MCP Docker container to a Cognee API server running on your host machine:
Simple Usage (Automatic localhost handling):
# Start your Cognee API server on the host
python -m cognee.api.client
# Run MCP container in API mode - localhost is automatically converted!
docker run \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e API_URL=http://localhost:8000 \
-e API_TOKEN=your_auth_token \
-p 8001:8000 \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainNote: The container will automatically convert localhost to host.docker.internal on Mac/Windows/Docker Desktop. You'll see a message in the logs showing the conversion.
Explicit host.docker.internal (Mac/Windows):
# Or explicitly use host.docker.internal
docker run \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e API_URL=http://host.docker.internal:8000 \
-e API_TOKEN=your_auth_token \
-p 8001:8000 \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainOn Linux (use host network or container IP):
# Option 1: Use host network (simplest)
docker run \
--network host \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e API_URL=http://localhost:8000 \
-e API_TOKEN=your_auth_token \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main
# Option 2: Use host IP address
# First, get your host IP: ip addr show docker0
docker run \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e API_URL=http://172.17.0.1:8000 \
-e API_TOKEN=your_auth_token \
-p 8001:8000 \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainEnvironment variables for API mode:
API_URL: URL of the running Cognee API serverAPI_TOKEN: Authentication token (optional, required if API has authentication enabled)
Note: When running in API mode:
Database migrations are automatically skipped (API server handles its own DB)
Some features are limited (see API Mode Limitations)
🔗 MCP Client Configuration
After starting your Cognee MCP server with Docker, you need to configure your MCP client to connect to it.
⚠️ Host/Origin protection (why you might get HTTP 421 or 403)
Both the http and sse transports validate the
HostandOriginheaders to block DNS-rebinding attacks, on every bind address including loopback — rebinding targets loopback services specifically, so127.0.0.1is not a mitigation.
A
Hostthe server does not recognise returns421 Misdirected RequestAn
Originit does not recognise returns403 ForbiddenWhen you bind a non-loopback address (
--host 0.0.0.0, which is what the Docker entrypoint does), onlylocalhost/127.0.0.1/[::1]are accepted by default, so reaching the server by LAN IP or a custom hostname returns 421 — the guard working, not a bug.Allow specific hosts (the
:*port glob is required):-e MCP_ALLOWED_HOSTS="192.168.1.50:*,myserver.local:*"Or turn the guard off entirely (only on a trusted network):
-e MCP_DISABLE_DNS_REBINDING_PROTECTION=trueImplementation note. FastMCP installs this guard on its streamable-http app only —
create_sse_app()accepts no such option, so the allow-lists were silently dropped for SSE. cognee-mcp mounts the same middleware on the SSE app itself, with the same allow-lists, so both transports behave identically.
SSE Transport Configuration (Legacy — prefer HTTP below; both are guarded)
Start the server with SSE transport:
docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse --env-file ./.env -p 8000:8000 --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainConfigure your MCP client:
Claude CLI (Easiest)
claude mcp add cognee-sse -t sse http://localhost:8000/sseVerify the connection:
claude mcp listYou should see your server connected:
Checking MCP server health...
cognee-sse: http://localhost:8000/sse (SSE) - ✓ ConnectedManual Configuration
Claude (~/.claude.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"cognee": {
"type": "sse",
"url": "http://localhost:8000/sse"
}
}
}Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"cognee-sse": {
"url": "http://localhost:8000/sse"
}
}
}HTTP Transport Configuration (Recommended)
Start the server with HTTP transport:
docker run -e TRANSPORT_MODE=http --env-file ./.env -p 8000:8000 --rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainConfigure your MCP client:
Claude CLI (Easiest)
claude mcp add cognee-http -t http http://localhost:8000/mcpVerify the connection:
claude mcp listYou should see your server connected:
Checking MCP server health...
cognee-http: http://localhost:8000/mcp (HTTP) - ✓ ConnectedManual Configuration
Claude (~/.claude.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"cognee": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:8000/mcp"
}
}
}Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"cognee-http": {
"url": "http://localhost:8000/mcp"
}
}
}Dual Configuration Example
You can configure both transports simultaneously for testing:
{
"mcpServers": {
"cognee-sse": {
"type": "sse",
"url": "http://localhost:8000/sse"
},
"cognee-http": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:8000/mcp"
}
}
}Note: Only enable the server you're actually running to avoid connection errors.
🌐 Connection Modes
The MCP server supports three connection modes:
Direct Mode (Default)
The MCP server directly imports and uses the cognee library with local databases (SQLite, LanceDB, Ladybug). This is the default mode with full feature support.
Cloud Mode
Connect to Cognee Cloud or a remote Cognee instance. The server calls cognee.serve() at startup, and all SDK operations transparently route to the cloud. No local databases needed.
Via CLI flags:
python src/server.py --serve-url https://your-instance.cognee.ai --serve-api-key ck_...Via environment variables (zero-config):
export COGNEE_SERVICE_URL="https://your-instance.cognee.ai"
export COGNEE_API_KEY="ck_..."
python src/server.pyCloud Mode with Docker:
docker run \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e COGNEE_SERVICE_URL=https://your-instance.cognee.ai \
-e COGNEE_API_KEY=ck_... \
-p 8000:8000 \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainCloud Mode arguments / environment variables:
--serve-url/COGNEE_SERVICE_URL: Cognee Cloud or remote instance URL--serve-api-key/COGNEE_API_KEY: API key for the instance
Database migrations are automatically skipped in Cloud mode.
API Mode
The MCP server connects to an already running Cognee FastAPI server via HTTP requests. This is useful when:
You have a centralized Cognee API server running
You want to separate the MCP server from the knowledge graph backend
You need multiple MCP servers to share the same knowledge graph
Starting the MCP server in API mode:
# Start your Cognee FastAPI server first (default port 8000)
cd /path/to/cognee
python -m cognee.api.client
# Then start the MCP server in API mode
cd cognee-mcp
python src/server.py --api-url http://localhost:8000 --api-token YOUR_AUTH_TOKENAPI Mode with different transports:
# With SSE transport
python src/server.py --transport sse --api-url http://localhost:8000 --api-token YOUR_TOKEN
# With HTTP transport
python src/server.py --transport http --api-url http://localhost:8000 --api-token YOUR_TOKENAPI Mode with Docker:
# On Mac/Windows (use host.docker.internal to access host)
docker run \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e API_URL=http://host.docker.internal:8000 \
-e API_TOKEN=YOUR_TOKEN \
-p 8001:8000 \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:main
# On Linux (use host network)
docker run \
--network host \
-e TRANSPORT_MODE=sse \
-e API_URL=http://localhost:8000 \
-e API_TOKEN=YOUR_TOKEN \
--rm -it cognee/cognee-mcp:mainCommand-line arguments for API mode:
--api-url: Base URL of the running Cognee FastAPI server (e.g.,http://localhost:8000)--api-token: Authentication token for the API (optional, required if API has authentication enabled)
Docker environment variables for API mode:
API_URL: Base URL of the running Cognee FastAPI serverAPI_TOKEN: Authentication token (optional, required if API has authentication enabled)
API Mode behavior:
The MCP server intentionally exposes only the memory API: remember, recall, and forget (plus the cognify_status progress check).
In API mode these tools call the Cognee API server endpoints directly. Operational helpers such as
cognify, search, list_data, delete, prune, improve, and document retrieval helpers are
kept internal and are not exposed as MCP tools.
💻 Basic Usage
The MCP server exposes its functionality through tools. Call them from any MCP client (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Cline, Roo and more).
Available Tools
The MCP server exposes four tools (three memory tools pinned in tools/list, plus cognify_status):
remember: Store data in memory. Pass
datafor text, orfilename+content_base64to ingest an uploaded file (up to 10 MB). Withsession_id: fast session cache (text only). Withoutsession_id: permanent graph memoryrecall: Search memory with auto-routing. Searches session cache first when
session_idis provided, then falls through to the permanent graphforget: Delete memory by dataset name or id, a single data item by
data_id, or delete all owned memory witheverything=Truecognify_status: Check the progress of background ingestion started by
remember(background=True). Unadvertised by default; discoverable viasearch_toolsand callable by name
Recall result summaries
recall (the MCP memory-search tool) starts every successful response with a
summary, followed by the same result body as before:
3 memories found (2 from sessions, 1 from project docs)
[session] ...The count is the number of returned memory entries, not top_k, underlying
chunks used to synthesize an answer, or system status messages. Source and dataset
hints use metadata already present in the returned entries; no recency lookup or
extra LLM call is made.
Empty results distinguish an empty memory graph, indexing in progress, indexing
failure, and no match. When available, progress is displayed as, for example,
still indexing — 12/40 items processed, retry shortly. These are data items,
not an inferred chunk count. A graph with no recorded indexing run is reported
as not yet indexed. If the status check fails or exceeds its two-second budget,
the summary explicitly says memory status is unavailable. Successful hits do
not trigger status checks.
The MCP content remains a single TextContent block. Text consumers can separate
line one from the unchanged body with text.partition("\n"). Machine consumers
can read content[0]._meta["cognee/memory"], containing count and state.
state is one of four values, one per action a caller can take:
state | meaning |
| memory contributed; |
| ingestion is still running — retry shortly |
| ingestion failed — check |
| nothing to return |
indexing additionally carries completed/total when the pipeline reports
them. Tool errors retain their existing Error: response.
Tool surface (COGNEE_MCP_TOOL_MODE)
Advertising every tool up front costs agent context and hurts tool-selection accuracy, so by default the server pins a small set in tools/list and makes the rest discoverable through FastMCP's built-in search_tools. Unadvertised tools stay callable by name.
COGNEE_MCP_TOOL_MODE=default # pinned: remember, recall, forget
COGNEE_MCP_TOOL_MODE=minimal # pinned: remember, recall, forget
COGNEE_MCP_TOOL_MODE=all # no search transform; advertise every toolAlso settable per-process with --tool-mode. In default/minimal an agent calls search_tools(query=...) to find a tool and either calls it by name or goes through the call_tool proxy. Tiers are declared per tool via @registry.tool(tags={...}) in src/server.py, so the pinned set is derived from the decorators rather than a separate list.
search_tools returns up to TOOL_SEARCH_MAX_RESULTS (10) tools, sized for a catalog that will grow. The window only costs context on turns that actually call search; tools/list stays constant either way. See tests/test_tool_search_benchmark.py for the recall sweep behind the number.
Writing a tool so search can find it
Search works well on natural-language queries. Every phrasing below returns its target ranked first (covered by tests/test_tool_search.py):
query | returns |
"is my background ingestion finished?" |
|
"check the progress of a pipeline job" |
|
The one thing to know when adding a tool: matching is purely lexical. FastMCP's BM25 tokenizer does no stemming and drops tools that score zero, so a query shares no credit with a word it doesn't literally contain. Multi-word queries paper over this (they usually contain some matching token), which is why the table above passes, but terse queries won't.
So: write descriptions in the words an agent would use, including both singular and plural. Recall is bounded by vocabulary, not by TOOL_SEARCH_MAX_RESULTS. If lexical matching ever stops being enough, BaseSearchTransform leaves _search() abstract — a semantic ranker over cognee's own embeddings can be dropped in without touching the rest of the plumbing.
Agent Scoping (per-client default datasets)
By default, each MCP client gets its own auto-named dataset (e.g. Cursor → cursor_vscode_memory, Claude Code → claude_code_memory) so different agents don't share memory unintentionally. The dataset is created on demand the first time a client writes to it.
remember and cognify_status route to the agent-scoped dataset when dataset_name is omitted (the internal cognify/improve helpers, which are not exposed as tools, do the same). Pass dataset_name explicitly to override (e.g. dataset_name="main_dataset" still works).
To disable agent scoping and have all clients share main_dataset as the default, set in .env:
COGNEE_MCP_AGENT_SCOPED=falseWhen disabled, no per-client datasets are autocreated.
Per-dataset isolation (ENABLE_BACKEND_ACCESS_CONTROL)
Agent scoping decides which dataset name a tool defaults to. Whether two datasets are actually isolated at the storage layer is governed by cognee's ENABLE_BACKEND_ACCESS_CONTROL flag:
true(default) — each(user, dataset)pair gets its own per-dataset Kuzu + LanceDB under.cognee_system/databases/<dataset_uuid>/, and search is strictly per-dataset.false— all datasets share one Kuzu graph DB and one LanceDB. The dataset filter is honored for top-level data points, butGRAPH_COMPLETIONtraversal can pull connected nodes from any dataset. Use for single-user local dev; also disables the API auth requirement unlessREQUIRE_AUTHENTICATION=trueis set explicitly.
Switching modes wipes nothing automatically — but data does not migrate. Data ingested in one mode lives at a different on-disk path than the other and won't be visible after the flip. Clean-slate when changing the flag:
# Stop server, then:
DATA_ROOT="/absolute/path/to/data-root"
rm -rf "$DATA_ROOT/.cognee_system" "$DATA_ROOT/.data_storage"
# Edit .env to flip ENABLE_BACKEND_ACCESS_CONTROL, restart, re-cognify.(Set DATA_ROOT to whatever you used for DATA_ROOT_DIRECTORY / SYSTEM_ROOT_DIRECTORY, or your cognee install dir if you didn't set those.)
Examples:
# Store permanent memory
remember(data="Cognee MCP now exposes a focused memory API.", dataset_name="main_dataset")
# Store session memory
remember(data="Temporary working note", session_id="agent-session-1")
# Recall from memory
recall(query="What changed in the MCP server?", session_id="agent-session-1")
# Delete one dataset
forget(dataset="main_dataset")Select an uploaded ontology for a write
Pass ontology_key to remember to ground permanent-memory extraction with one
or more previously uploaded OWL ontologies:
remember(data="Alice works at Acme.", dataset_name="workspace_a", ontology_key="workspace_a_v2")
remember(
data="Acme develops software.",
ontology_key=["organizations", "software"],
background=True,
)In API mode, upload the ontologies first through POST /api/v1/ontologies using
the same authenticated user as the MCP server. Keys are sent as repeated
ontology_key form fields. In local mode, keys resolve through OntologyService
in the default user's local ontology store; remote uploads are not copied locally.
Unknown or inaccessible keys fail the write. Background failures are reported by
cognify_status.
Omitting ontology_key (or passing an empty list) preserves the configured
server ontology, including ONTOLOGY_FILE_PATH. Ontology selection is only for
permanent writes: combining a nonempty key with session_id returns an error
because session-cache writes do not perform extraction.
Development and Debugging
Debugging
Use the fastmcp CLI, not mcp. Since the FastMCP 3 migration this server is a
standalone fastmcp.FastMCP instance, which the mcp CLI does not recognise —
mcp dev src/server.py fails with "Ignoring object 'src/server.py:mcp' as it's not a
valid server object".
Inspect the server without launching anything (fast sanity check — name, version, tool count):
uv run fastmcp inspect src/server.py:mcpRun it against the MCP Inspector UI:
uv run fastmcp dev src/server.py:mcpOpen the inspector with a longer timeout — cognee's first call can be slow while the databases initialise:
http://localhost:5173?timeout=120000To apply new changes while developing cognee:
Update dependencies in the cognee folder if needed
uv sync --group dev --reinstalluv run fastmcp dev src/server.py:mcp
The
:mcpsuffix names the server object in the file. Without it the CLI has to guess, and the guess is not reliable across FastMCP versions.
Development
In order to use local cognee:
Uncomment the following line in the cognee-mcp
pyproject.tomlfile and set the cognee root path.#"cognee[postgres-binary,docs,neo4j] @ file:/path/to/your/cognee"Replace
/path/to/your/cogneewith the absolute path to your cognee checkout, and comment out the released"cognee[...]>=1.5.0,<2.0.0"line directly below it — otherwise both requirements apply and uv resolves the published package instead.Install dependencies with uv in the mcp folder
uv sync --reinstallRe-run this after every change to the local cognee checkout.
Note: editing that line modifies the tracked
pyproject.tomland rewritesuv.lockwith a machine-local absolute path. Revert both before committing —git checkout -- pyproject.toml uv.lock— or the path leaks into the repo.
Code of Conduct
We are committed to making open source an enjoyable and respectful experience for our community. See CODE_OF_CONDUCT for more information.
💫 Contributors
Star History
Available Tools
5 toolscall_toolA
Call a tool by name with the given arguments.
Use this to execute tools discovered via search_tools.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name of the tool to call | |
| arguments | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not mention potential side effects, required permissions, or the fact that this tool may execute arbitrary actions. This lack of transparency is risky for an agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no redundant information. The description is efficient and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description explains the basic purpose and links to search_tools, but it lacks details on error handling, return values, or behavioral constraints. Given the tool's generic nature, this is acceptable but not comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only the 'name' parameter has a description in the schema; 'arguments' is not described. The description adds minimal value by implying arguments are passed, but does not clarify structure or constraints, leaving significant ambiguity.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (call a tool) and the target (by name with arguments), and it is distinct from the sibling tools which perform specific operations like remember or recall.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It explicitly says to use this for executing tools discovered via search_tools, giving a clear use case. It does not elaborate on when not to use it, but the guidance is sufficient for typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
forgetA
Delete data from memory.
Can target a single data item, a specific dataset (by name or id), or everything the user owns. Removes data from the relational DB, graph DB, and vector DB.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data_id | No | UUID of a single data item to delete. Must be paired with `dataset` or `dataset_id` so the owning dataset is unambiguous. | |
| dataset | No | Dataset name to delete entirely. | |
| dataset_id | No | UUID of the dataset to delete entirely, or to scope `data_id`. | |
| everything | No | If true, delete ALL data across all datasets. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses that records are removed from three types of databases, which is useful. However, it does not mention irreversibility, permission requirements, or potential cascading effects. This is adequate but not comprehensive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is succinct, leading with the primary action, then the targeting options, and finally the storage impact. No unnecessary words; every sentence adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a delete operation, it covers the key aspects: what can be deleted, how scope is specified, and which storage layers are affected. It does not explain error scenarios or side effects beyond deletion, but that is not essential given the presence of an output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already documents each parameter at 100% coverage. The description adds overarching semantics: it clarifies that data_id must be paired with a dataset identifier, and distinguishes three targeting modes. This guidance helps the agent correctly combine parameters beyond what individual descriptions provide.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description begins with 'Delete data from memory', a precise verb+resource pair, and enumerates the three deletion scopes (single item, dataset by name/id, everything). It also specifies that deletion spans relational, graph, and vector databases, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like remember and recall.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies this tool is for deletion but does not explicitly name alternatives or conditions. It could have said 'Use this instead of remember/recall for removing data' to guide the agent, but the intent is clear from context and sibling names.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
recallA
Search memory with auto-routing and session awareness.
When session_id is provided without datasets or search_type, searches session cache first by keyword matching. Falls through to the permanent knowledge graph if no session results match.
Auto-routing picks the best search strategy when search_type is not specified.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Natural language query to search for. | |
| top_k | No | Maximum results to return (default: 15). | |
| datasets | No | Comma-separated dataset names to search within. | |
| session_id | No | Session ID for session-first search. | |
| search_type | No | Override auto-routing with one SearchType name. Completion types (answer written by an LLM): HYBRID_COMPLETION (the default when routing is off), GRAPH_COMPLETION, GRAPH_COMPLETION_COT, GRAPH_COMPLETION_CONTEXT_EXTENSION, GRAPH_COMPLETION_DECOMPOSITION, GRAPH_SUMMARY_COMPLETION, RAG_COMPLETION, TRIPLET_COMPLETION, TEMPORAL, AGENTIC_COMPLETION. Retrieval-only types (no LLM): CHUNKS, CHUNKS_LEXICAL, SUMMARIES, SKILLS, CODE. Other: CYPHER, NATURAL_LANGUAGE, CODING_RULES, GRAPH_REPORT, FEELING_LUCKY. An unknown name is rejected with a validation error. | |
| system_prompt | No | Override the synthesis prompt for completion searches. When omitted, falls back to COGNEE_MCP_RECALL_SYSTEM_PROMPT / _FILE if configured on the server. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations present, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden and does it reasonably well by explaining session-first fallback and automatic strategy selection. It does not describe result formatting or failure modes, but those are partly covered by the output schema and the search_type validation note in the schema.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is compact, front-loaded with the core purpose, and each sentence adds behavior detail without repetition or filler. The paragraph breaks make the routing rules scannable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a read-style search tool with a rich input schema and an output schema, the description plus schema covers invocation, routing, fallback, and override behavior. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to select and call the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already documented; the description adds value by explaining the conditional interaction between session_id, datasets, and search_type beyond the schema's field-level text. It clarifies that search_type is an override of routing and that session behavior changes when session_id is supplied alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource ('Search memory') and identifies the key behaviors ('auto-routing and session awareness'), so an agent can tell it is a retrieval tool. It does not explicitly distinguish recall from the sibling search_tools, keeping it one step below a fully differentiated purpose statement.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides concrete routing conditions: when session_id is present without datasets or search_type, search the session cache first, then fall through to the knowledge graph; and auto-routing applies when search_type is omitted. It gives clear context for invoking the tool correctly, though it does not mention when to prefer it over sibling tools such as search_tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
rememberA
Store data in memory.
Two modes depending on whether session_id is provided:
Without session_id (permanent memory): Runs the full add + cognify pipeline to ingest data and build the knowledge graph, then the self-improvement loop (improve) unless self_improvement=False.
With session_id (session memory): Stores the data in the session cache only. Fast, no entity extraction. Omit session_id when the content should be stored as permanent graph memory.
Pass either data (text) or filename + content_base64 (a file
upload, up to 10 MB), not both. File uploads are permanent-memory
only and don't support session_id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | No | The text content to store. Mutually exclusive with filename/content_base64. | |
| filename | No | Original filename for a file upload. Used to derive the stored document's name. Requires content_base64. | |
| background | No | Queue permanent ingestion as a background task and return immediately instead of waiting for the pipeline. Use when the caller has a request deadline shorter than ingestion takes. Ignored with session_id, which is already fast. Errors surface via cognify_status, not the return value. | |
| session_id | No | Session ID. When set, stores in session cache only. | |
| dataset_name | No | Target dataset name. Defaults to the current MCP client's agent-scoped dataset (e.g. "cursor_vscode_memory"), or "main_dataset" if no client identity is detected. | |
| ontology_key | No | One or more uploaded ontology keys for extraction (permanent mode only). API mode uses ontologies uploaded by the authenticated API user. Local mode uses the default user's ontology store. Omit to keep the configured server ontology. | |
| custom_prompt | No | Custom prompt for entity extraction (permanent mode only). | |
| content_base64 | No | Base64-encoded file content to ingest. Requires filename. | |
| self_improvement | No | Run the improve loop (triplet enrichment and, with sessions, the session bridge) after cognify. Permanent mode only; default True. Pass False for a plain add + cognify ingestion. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden and does so thoroughly. It discloses the permanent pipeline (add + cognify + optional improve loop), the session-cache fast path with no entity extraction, file upload constraints, and the mutual exclusivity of data vs file upload.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-organized and front-loaded, with the core purpose stated first and mode-specific details cleanly separated. Every sentence adds operational value, and the file-upload constraint is included without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with two modes, 9 optional parameters, and an output schema, the description covers the key decision points and constraints necessary to call it correctly. The output schema covers return values, and the input schema covers remaining parameter details, so no critical operational context is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description adds meaningful parameter semantics: it explains how session_id switches modes, that data is mutually exclusive with filename/content_base64, and that file uploads are limited to 10 MB and permanent-memory only. This goes beyond the schema's per-field descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb-resource pair ('Store data in memory') and then distinguishes the tool by splitting it into permanent and session memory modes. This clearly separates it from siblings like recall and forget, which handle retrieval and deletion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives explicit guidance on when to use permanent vs session memory, including the rule to omit session_id for permanent storage. It does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like recall or search_tools, but the mode-selection context is strong enough to guide correct use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_toolsA
Search for tools using natural language.
Returns matching tool definitions ranked by relevance, in the same format as list_tools.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Natural language query to search for tools |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states that it returns matching tool definitions ranked by relevance, which is a behavioral trait. It also mentions the format is same as list_tools, which is useful. However, it doesn't disclose any side effects, rate limits, or other behavioral details. Given the tool is a search operation, this is adequate but not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise, two sentences, and front-loaded with the purpose. Every sentence adds value: the first states what it does, the second clarifies the return format. No waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with one parameter and an output schema. The description explains the return format (same as list_tools) and ranking by relevance. Given the simplicity and the presence of an output schema, the description is complete enough. It could mention that it's a read-only operation, but that's not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the single parameter 'query' as a natural language query. The description adds no additional meaning beyond that. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: searching for tools using natural language. It specifies the action (search) and the resource (tools), and distinguishes it from siblings like list_tools by mentioning the return format. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from other sibling tools like call_tool, but the purpose is clear.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage: when you need to find tools by natural language query. It mentions the return format is same as list_tools, which gives some context. However, it doesn't explicitly state when to use this vs alternatives, nor does it provide exclusions or alternative tool references. The guidance is minimal but not misleading.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v1.6.0- Changed
forget6 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / data_id / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / data_id / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / dataset / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / dataset / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / dataset_id / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / dataset_id / typeRemoved value: -"string"
- Changed
recall10 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / datasets / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / datasets / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / search_type / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / search_type / descriptionPrevious value: -"Override auto-routing. Options: GRAPH_COMPLETION,\nGRAPH_COMPLETION_COT, RAG_COMPLETION, CHUNKS, SUMMARIES,\nTEMPORAL, FEELING_LUCKY, etc."New value: +"Override auto-routing with one SearchType name. Completion types\n(answer written by an LLM): HYBRID_COMPLETION (the default when\nrouting is off), GRAPH_COMPLETION, GRAPH_COMPLETION_COT,\nGRAPH_COMPLETION_CONTEXT_EXTENSION, GRAPH_COMPLETION_DECOMPOSITION,\nGRAPH_SUMMARY_COMPLETION, RAG_COMPLETION, TRIPLET_COMPLETION,\nTEMPORAL, AGENTIC_COMPLETION. Retrieval-only types (no LLM):\nCHUNKS, CHUNKS_LEXICAL, SUMMARIES, SKILLS, CODE. Other: CYPHER,\nNATURAL_LANGUAGE, CODING_RULES, GRAPH_REPORT, FEELING_LUCKY.\nAn unknown name is rejected with a validation error." - removed
Input schema / properties / search_type / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / session_id / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / session_id / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / system_prompt / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / system_prompt / typeRemoved value: -"string" - changed
Input schema / properties / top_k / descriptionPrevious value: -"Maximum results to return (default: 10)."New value: +"Maximum results to return (default: 15)."
- Changed
remember14 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / content_base64 / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / content_base64 / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / custom_prompt / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / custom_prompt / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / data / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / data / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / dataset_name / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / dataset_name / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / filename / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / filename / typeRemoved value: -"string" - added
Input schema / properties / ontology_keyAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "One or more uploaded ontology keys for extraction (permanent mode only).\nAPI mode uses ontologies uploaded by the authenticated API user. Local\nmode uses the default user's ontology store. Omit to keep the configured\nserver ontology." +} - added
Input schema / properties / self_improvementAdded value: +{ + "default": true, + "description": "Run the improve loop (triplet enrichment and, with sessions, the\nsession bridge) after cognify. Permanent mode only; default True.\nPass False for a plain add + cognify ingestion.", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Input schema / properties / session_id / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - removed
Input schema / properties / session_id / typeRemoved value: -"string"
5 tool updates
v1.5.1- Changed
forget2 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / data_idAdded value: +{ + "default": null, + "description": "UUID of a single data item to delete. Must be paired with `dataset`\nor `dataset_id` so the owning dataset is unambiguous.", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / dataset_idAdded value: +{ + "default": null, + "description": "UUID of the dataset to delete entirely, or to scope `data_id`.", + "type": "string" +}
- Removed
open_cognee_workspace - Changed
remember1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / backgroundAdded value: +{ + "default": false, + "description": "Queue permanent ingestion as a background task and return immediately\ninstead of waiting for the pipeline. Use when the caller has a request\ndeadline shorter than ingestion takes. Ignored with session_id, which\nis already fast. Errors surface via cognify_status, not the return\nvalue.", + "type": "boolean" +}
- Removed
upload_file_ui - Removed
visualize_graph_ui
13 tool updates
v1.5.0- Added
call_tool - Removed
cognify_file - Removed
create_dataset_json - Changed
forget7 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - added
Input schema / properties / dataset / descriptionAdded value: +"Dataset name to delete entirely." - removed
Input schema / properties / dataset / titleRemoved value: -"Dataset" - added
Input schema / properties / everything / descriptionAdded value: +"If true, delete ALL data across all datasets." - removed
Input schema / properties / everything / titleRemoved value: -"Everything" - removed
Input schema / titleRemoved value: -"forgetArguments" - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "result": { + "items": {}, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "result" + ], + "type": "object", + "x-fastmcp-wrap-result": true +}
- Removed
get_client_info_json - Removed
list_dataset_data_json - Removed
list_datasets_json - Changed
open_cognee_workspace2 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - removed
Input schema / titleRemoved value: -"open_cognee_workspaceArguments"
- Changed
recall15 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - added
Input schema / properties / datasets / descriptionAdded value: +"Comma-separated dataset names to search within." - removed
Input schema / properties / datasets / titleRemoved value: -"Datasets" - added
Input schema / properties / query / descriptionAdded value: +"Natural language query to search for." - removed
Input schema / properties / query / titleRemoved value: -"Query" - added
Input schema / properties / search_type / descriptionAdded value: +"Override auto-routing. Options: GRAPH_COMPLETION,\nGRAPH_COMPLETION_COT, RAG_COMPLETION, CHUNKS, SUMMARIES,\nTEMPORAL, FEELING_LUCKY, etc." - removed
Input schema / properties / search_type / titleRemoved value: -"Search Type" - added
Input schema / properties / session_id / descriptionAdded value: +"Session ID for session-first search." - removed
Input schema / properties / session_id / titleRemoved value: -"Session Id" - added
Input schema / properties / system_prompt / descriptionAdded value: +"Override the synthesis prompt for completion searches. When omitted,\nfalls back to COGNEE_MCP_RECALL_SYSTEM_PROMPT / _FILE if configured\non the server." - removed
Input schema / properties / system_prompt / titleRemoved value: -"System Prompt" - added
Input schema / properties / top_k / descriptionAdded value: +"Maximum results to return (default: 10)." - removed
Input schema / properties / top_k / titleRemoved value: -"Top K" - removed
Input schema / titleRemoved value: -"recallArguments" - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "result": { + "items": {}, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "result" + ], + "type": "object", + "x-fastmcp-wrap-result": true +}
- Changed
remember15 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - added
Input schema / properties / content_base64Added value: +{ + "default": null, + "description": "Base64-encoded file content to ingest. Requires filename.", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / custom_prompt / descriptionAdded value: +"Custom prompt for entity extraction (permanent mode only)." - removed
Input schema / properties / custom_prompt / titleRemoved value: -"Custom Prompt" - added
Input schema / properties / data / defaultAdded value: +null - added
Input schema / properties / data / descriptionAdded value: +"The text content to store. Mutually exclusive with\nfilename/content_base64." - removed
Input schema / properties / data / titleRemoved value: -"Data" - added
Input schema / properties / dataset_name / descriptionAdded value: +"Target dataset name. Defaults to the current MCP client's\nagent-scoped dataset (e.g. \"cursor_vscode_memory\"), or\n\"main_dataset\" if no client identity is detected." - removed
Input schema / properties / dataset_name / titleRemoved value: -"Dataset Name" - added
Input schema / properties / filenameAdded value: +{ + "default": null, + "description": "Original filename for a file upload. Used to derive the stored\ndocument's name. Requires content_base64.", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / session_id / descriptionAdded value: +"Session ID. When set, stores in session cache only." - removed
Input schema / properties / session_id / titleRemoved value: -"Session Id" - removed
Input schema / requiredRemoved value: -[ - "data" -] - removed
Input schema / titleRemoved value: -"rememberArguments" - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "result": { + "items": {}, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "result" + ], + "type": "object", + "x-fastmcp-wrap-result": true +}
- Added
search_tools - Changed
upload_file_ui2 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - removed
Input schema / titleRemoved value: -"upload_file_uiArguments"
- Changed
visualize_graph_ui3 fields changed- added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - removed
Input schema / properties / dataset_name / titleRemoved value: -"Dataset Name" - removed
Input schema / titleRemoved value: -"visualize_graph_uiArguments"
4 tool updates
v1.4.1- Added
create_dataset_json - Added
get_client_info_json - Added
recall - Added
remember
4 tool updates
v1.4.0- Removed
create_dataset_json - Removed
get_client_info_json - Removed
recall - Removed
remember
1 tool update
v1.0.2- Changed
recall1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / top_k / defaultPrevious value: -10New value: +15
11 tool updates
v1.0.1- First observed
cognify_file - First observed
create_dataset_json - First observed
forget - First observed
get_client_info_json - First observed
list_dataset_data_json - First observed
list_datasets_json - First observed
open_cognee_workspace - First observed
recall - First observed
remember - First observed
upload_file_ui - First observed
visualize_graph_ui
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The memory operations remember/recall/forget are clearly distinct, but call_tool and search_tools introduce a meta-layer that overlaps with direct tool invocation and with recall (searching tools vs searching memory). An agent could easily reach for search_tools when it means to search memory, or call_tool instead of a specific memory tool.
The memory trio uses single-word verbs (remember/recall/forget), while the other two use snake_case verb_noun patterns (call_tool/search_tools). All names are lowercase and readable, but the convention is not consistent across the full set.
Five tools is a reasonable size for a memory-focused server, and the three domain tools cover the core workflow. The count is slightly inflated by two generic meta-tools that are not memory-specific, but it is still well within a sensible range.
The set covers the main memory lifecycle: store (remember), search/retrieve (recall), and delete (forget), with session and permanent modes. Missing explicit update or list operations creates minor gaps, but agents can work around them in a memory system.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Persistent memory for AI agents. Semantic search, memory graph, W3C DID identity.
Persistent memory and knowledge management for AI agents with semantic search and 50+ tools.
Universal memory for AI agents and tools. Save, organize and search context anywhere.
Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to store, retrieve, and connect information in a Neo4j graph database as persistent memory, with semantic relationships, natural language search, and temporal tracking across conversations.944 npm70MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancePersistent knowledge memory layer for AI agents. Hybrid semantic + full-text search with pgvector, code dependency graph with blast-radius impact analysis, and incremental indexing for 7 languages. In-process ONNX embeddings, no external API required.24 npm35MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent knowledge graph memory for AI agents, enabling them to store, recall, and query facts about people, projects, and relationships across sessions.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables LLMs to store, search, and manage memories with hybrid semantic and keyword search using ChromaDB and Neo4j for persistent memory and knowledge graph capabilities.-