List providers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It adds context that the list is limited to those who take online bookings, which is a behavioral trait. However, it does not disclose other potential traits like pagination, ordering, or whether the list is real-time or cached.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences with no fluff. It front-loads the main action and includes the filter as secondary. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter, no output schema), the description covers the essential purpose and filter. It could be more complete by mentioning ordering or pagination, but for a list tool with common expectations, it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains the parameter. The description merely reiterates that the filter is for providers who perform the given serviceId, adding no new meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List'), the resource ('stylists/providers'), and the context ('who take online bookings'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'list_services' by specifying providers. The optional filter by serviceId is also mentioned, adding precision.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the description does not explicitly state when or when not to use this tool, the purpose is clear enough to distinguish from siblings (e.g., 'book_appointment' is for booking, not listing). The context implies use when you need a list of providers, especially with optional filtering.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.